233
submitted 9 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) said Tuesday he is directing House committees to open an impeachment inquiry into President Biden, amid pressure from some hard-right members of the Republican caucus to do so.

The inquiry would center on whether Biden benefited from his son Hunter Biden’s business dealings, among other issues, McCarthy said.

“These are allegations of abuse of power, obstruction and corruption and warrant further investigation by the House of Representatives,” McCarthy told reporters Tuesday morning. “That’s why today I am directing our House committee to open a formal impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden.”

McCarthy spoke for three minutes, did not take any questions and left the lectern shortly after making his remarks. McCarthy has previously said he would not launch an inquiry without a vote by the full house.

The House faces a critical Sept. 30 deadline to fund the government and avoid a shutdown. McCarthy has been trying to hang on to support for a funding bill from far-right GOP lawmakers, who have been pushing to impeach Biden.

Republican leaders have been weighing whether to use an impeachment inquiry vote as a bargaining chip in the funding negotiations. But it’s not certain that Republicans have the necessary 218 votes to pass it. Some lawmakers are staunchly against it, and McCarthy has said that an impeachment inquiry would occur through a vote on the House floor, as opposed to his unilateral decision-making.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] iforgotmyinstance@lemmy.world 158 points 9 months ago
[-] toasteecup@lemmy.world 73 points 9 months ago

Losing 14 ratification votes will do that to a schmuck

[-] brihuang95@sopuli.xyz 19 points 9 months ago

honestly, at this rate i wouldn't be surprised if every future president gets an impeachment inquiry from the opposite side just out of pettiness

[-] chaogomu@kbin.social 30 points 9 months ago

Every Republican will easily earn one, every Democrat will get one regardless.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 14 points 9 months ago

Smells like a well oiled propaganda machine doing exactly what it's supposed to. I don't think this is desperation I think it's theater and a lot of people are eating this shit up.

[-] donuts@kbin.social 147 points 9 months ago

Republicans are absolutely desperate to try to equate Biden with Trump so they can say "well Biden was impeached too" or "Biden had documents too".

That's what it's all about, and it's a gross distortion of government and democracy.

[-] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 43 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Nah, they did the same thing to Obama. They actually tried to impeach Obama multiple times. THE GOP IS DONE WITH GOVERNING THEY ARE ONLY INTERESTED IN POWER.

[-] Janoose@kbin.social 28 points 9 months ago

Not to mention a disgusting waste of tax payer dollars.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 18 points 9 months ago

Hilariously, they’re also trying to shut the government down at the same time. How the fuck do they think this is supposed to work?

[-] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 11 points 9 months ago

Panic. Fear. Uncertainty. All tools of an oppressor. If you create chaos you can blame anyone you want.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 6 points 9 months ago

Well, let’s not forget the obvious here: stupidity, jealousy, shortsightedness, and just plain old blind opportunism. All the basic characteristics of a Republican Congress-member. 

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Janoose@kbin.social 8 points 9 months ago

They’re planning on passing a bill that gives impeachment inquiries unlimited funds by taking money away from everything that might actually benefit the American people?

Republicans don’t live in reality, it’s very difficult to follow their “logic”.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] cultsuperstar@lemmy.ml 13 points 9 months ago

I think it's more to distract Trump supporters from all his indictments and trials, even though most don't give a shit and will vote for him even if he went on a murderous rampage school shooting. "Well was it a liberal school? It was? He's got my vote."

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 110 points 9 months ago

There is no such thing as a good conservative. Every conservative is vile garbage. Every single one.

[-] evatronic@lemm.ee 58 points 9 months ago

It's worth noting that even if "your guy" Republican hasn't actually voted for or said anything bad, they are complicit in allowing their colleagues to do so.

I.e., it's not just McConnell, but him and 49 other senators that allow him to lead.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] TheaoneAndOnly27@kbin.social 30 points 9 months ago

This extends to their supporters as well. Especially my piece of shit father-in-law.

[-] GrammatonCleric@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago

All my homies hate your piece of shit father-in-law

[-] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 16 points 9 months ago

and any that don't Vote. Apathy is complicit in result.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 70 points 9 months ago

Thanks for handing the house to democrats in 2024, fucknutz. We all know they aren't going to pass a government funding bill that will make it through the Senate. Even McConnell said what they are proposing HE wouldn't vote for.

We get absolutely nothing from these assholes that benefits the American people. Only a hand job for Trump and his shitty cult members.

#VOTE THE REPUBLICANS OUT!

[-] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 28 points 9 months ago

I agree with your intent, but doubt the optimism. Never bet on the Democratic Party to be unable to snatch defeat out of an easy victory. Unless everyone gets off their ass and Votes, we are doomed to the same corruption and waste we have watched for the past five decades.

[-] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Was going to say the same. If there’s one thing Democrats are good at, it’s passively discouraging democrat voters. And Republicans are really really good at riling up their voters.

If every single eligible voter was required to cast a vote, democrats would win in a landslide. But democrats don’t fucking vote, (disenfranchisement, feeling like their vote doesn’t matter, milquetoast candidates, etc,) so the numbers have roughly balanced out.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] flossdaily@lemmy.world 52 points 9 months ago

Even if you were one of the people who thought Trump was innocent, you could understand the very clear charges against him at both impeachments. We had the transcripts of his conversation extorting Ukraine, and you had the videos of the insurrection that he directed.

The evidence against Joe Biden is ... ?

It's non-existent. That's what it is.

This is Republicans 100 percent, beyond any doubt abusing their power. They continue to damage our democracy for the singular end of strengthening their grip on power.

[-] JPAKx4@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 9 months ago

The problem is, most of these Republicans didn't watch or read even a summary of any official proceedings. They are convinced that they're right, and don't need a person in a robe to tell them that God's chosen president was wrong.

[-] dingus@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago

All that matters to them is Truthiness, that hasn't changed since Bush was in office.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] books@lemmy.world 38 points 9 months ago

I mean, if he did anything wrong, I support this.

But it seems like every article doesn't really mention what he did wrong... or any sort of proof. Seems a bit premature to jump to impeachment without evidence but what the fuck don't know.

[-] quindraco@lemm.ee 37 points 9 months ago

In the news today: McCarthy is a liar, water is wet, and the GOP is inept.

[-] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 33 points 9 months ago

Do you think Trump benefited from insert like a million instances of his family being intermixed into his businesses and even government roles? I hate whataboutism, but republican hypocrisy is even worse.

[-] negativenull@lemm.ee 30 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Remember, Trump was initially impeached for:

In his first impeachment, the House in 2019 charged Trump with abuse of power and obstruction of Congress after he asked Ukraine to investigate Biden and his son on unsubstantiated corruption accusations.

Now, they are trying to impeach Biden for that same witch-hunt.

Edit: to be clear, Trump used Hunter to go after Joe Biden during the campaign. He did illegal shit to do it. The house repubs are trying to use Hunter again to go after Joe Biden. That's what I mean by the same witch-hunt.

[-] cowpowered@lemm.ee 32 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Trump was caught attempting to blackmail a foreign leader for political gain, with dramatic geopolitical implications. Hunter Biden's minor misdeeds are a total nothingburger in comparison. I agree with the other comment, this smells of desperation.

[-] dingus@lemmy.ml 14 points 9 months ago

He also allowed a foreign leaders security detail to violently assault US citizens.

[-] donuts@kbin.social 12 points 9 months ago

He wasn't impeached for that, but he should have been.

[-] Rusticus@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

When did Biden call a foreign power and threaten to withhold their funding if they didn't investigate Trump and his children?

[-] negativenull@lemm.ee 11 points 9 months ago

See my edit. I'm not doing a "both-sides-bad" thing here. I wasn't very clear.

[-] Rusticus@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

My bad. Thanks for the clarification.

[-] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 25 points 9 months ago

I live in California in a fairly blue congressional district with a Republican congressman. There's a great chance this will flip my district in 2024.

McCarthy's not bright enough to be third in line to be president. Hopefully this and the other BS he's pulled will cost him his Speakership position and relegate him to a footnote in American history.

[-] blazera@kbin.social 15 points 9 months ago

The inquiry would center on whether Biden benefited from his son Hunter Biden’s business dealings, among other issues, McCarthy said.

Im pretty sure this wouldnt be illegal even if true. I think immediate family is one of the exceptions to politicians receiving money from others. Again, and they keep ignoring this part, hunter is not a government official in any capacity. He's allowed to have business dealings. This is only abuse in the reverse scenario, if Biden used his position to benefit Hunter. But of course they cant even manage to allege that hes done anything like that, theyve got nothing.

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 12 points 9 months ago

He doesn't have the votes, but he will allow Congressional committees to keep doing their normal clown show without the benefit of an actual vote.

[-] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 8 points 9 months ago

Never count on any Republican to not be a PoS. Complicit if only to retain power is still complicit.

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 4 points 9 months ago

McCarthy’s soul has been sold so many times even the Devil is saying “pass” and letting crazy take the reins.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 10 points 9 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] UristMcHolland@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

Kevin McCarthy is absolutely spineless. Trying to impeach Biden is so transparently an attempt to make Trump's impeachmentS seem like no big deal to their constituencies.

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

The inquiry would center on whether Biden benefited from his son Hunter Biden’s business dealings, among other issues, McCarthy said.

You know what? Go for it, turtle man. Waste time and money doing that bullshit, dig up nothing, continue repeating the same talking points. MAYBE the dems will grow a pair and use that as ammo, but most probably won't.

[-] Perfide@reddthat.com 6 points 9 months ago

Turtle man is McConnell, not McCarthy, just fyi

[-] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The turtle guy is Moscow Mitch McConnell FYI. McCarthy is a different piece of shit.

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Oh heck, I mixed up the turtle and the one who sold himself out to terrorists.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] paddirn@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Oh god, they're still on Hunter Biden's laptop? Are we going to see Hunter Biden dick pics as part of an official House inquiry, entered into evidence and all that shit (if it hasn't happened already)?

We're in the midst of one of the greatest threats to human survival known to man (global climate change), and they're putzing around with piddly-ass BS fishing expedition for whatever scraps of impropriety that they think they can dredge up. If Biden had done even a fraction of the scandalous BS that Trump did on a weekly basis, I wouldn't mind an investigation being opened. Everyone should be held to standards, BUT given Republicans complete and blatant lack of honesty when dealing with Trump and Biden's apparent lack of any substantial rule-breaking that anybody has been able to present any evidence of... this looks pretty much like a fishing expedition.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2023
233 points (96.0% liked)

News

21678 readers
3010 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS