710
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/politics@lemmy.world

Likening people in the U.S. illegally to “human locusts,” Zuchowski wrote on a personal Facebook account and his campaign’s account: “When people ask me... What’s gonna happen if the Flip-Flopping, Laughing Hyena Wins?? I say ... write down all the addresses of the people who had her signs in their yards!” That way, Zuchowski continued, when migrants need places to live, “we’ll already have the addresses of their New families ... who supported their arrival!”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 24 points 5 days ago

Someone should write down his address and fill his yard with shit

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

Send all white homeless Americans there.

[-] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 35 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

in my experience police do not like it when you dox them

it is especially true with secret police and ex police

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 51 points 6 days ago

Will I be banned for posting his address? He is a public employee so it's publicly available data

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 12 points 5 days ago

Posting where to find that information will probably be OK.

[-] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 6 days ago
[-] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago
[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

i'd have to spend five bucks on a stalker website to get the address and I'm not spending money, so meh.

[-] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

beenverified has a $1 week trial

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

thats a dollar I could spend on churros my friend

[-] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

fair enough

[-] morphballganon@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

... why is this comment highlighted?

Edit: well, now it's not. Weird

[-] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I think we are allowed to say that the address he uses for collecting check donations goes to a house with a pool and two cars and an RV parked around it.

Edit: And 9 American flags just in the front of the house, WTF

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 4 points 5 days ago

One way to find out

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 37 points 6 days ago

Fascist piece of shit. Also, I hate this fucking ridiculous argument they take up - that people that support immigration have to put them up in their houses, personally? WTAF?

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago

I'll accept that if people who vote against abortion access are banned from having them

[-] Sculptor9157@sh.itjust.works 16 points 5 days ago

No. Voting against abortion means they must now house, feed, and maintain legal responsibility for all children who would have been aborted, through adulthood.

[-] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 10 points 6 days ago

This would require that the government be able to retrieve your individual voting record, and then stand in the way of your healthcare based on how you vote. Sounds like a neofascist pipedream.

I, for one, don't accept your authoritarian proposal.

[-] stratoscaster@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

That's the point they're making. It's absurd

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Katana314@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

Laughing Hyena

Setting aside the racism there, what exactly is the right's obsession with Kamala's laugh? I've heard "Cackling" as well.

Should I be inspired to hear that lord and savior Donald Trump never ever laughs - assuming that's even true?

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Laughing Hyena

That's racism and misogyny, all bundled up into two words. The cackling thing is what they say when they think a woman isn't meek enough. They particularly say it about women in positions of power, especially if they have the nerve to look happy.

[-] freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

The discomfort towards having women in positions of power goes back to the bronze-age morality of the bible. It's the same reason the traditional churches don't allow women to head the church or preach: they believe woman let the devil tempt and deceive them, and then they went and "caused man to sin". Then Paul came along and made sure women were put in their place in the New Testament.

[-] Bremmy@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago

They believe anything that isn't "tough" or "manly" is weakness. They're just pathetic and unbelievably insecure

[-] i_love_FFT@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 days ago

Time to inject noise in this database and put H signs everywhere at random

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

Abuse of office for political reasons. There should be a law to kick his sorry ass for this.

[-] dubious@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago

ohio democrats, here's what you do: buy guns.

[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Isn't the answer to all problems just more guns?

[-] dubious@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

in 21st century fascist, eco-dystopia america? yes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
710 points (99.0% liked)

politics

18930 readers
3134 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS