Why would they switch from a controlled demo like the towers to a random missile for the Pentagon? Or for that matter, why can't they just shoot missiles at both the towers and the Pentagon and blame it on scheming Iranians? It's weird for them to have two completely different modes of destruction on two different sets of buildings instead of just reusing the same mode of destruction for both sets of buildings or just blowing up one set of buildings instead of two.
this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
72 points (100.0% liked)
chapotraphouse
13934 readers
696 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Towers = tall, everybody will see the missiles
Also the Pentagon collapsing out of nowhere from a demolition doesn't make sense at all
load more comments
(11 replies)
The hole is the part where you really have to suspend all disbelief to carry water for the official story. The fuselage, which is made of cardboard, maintains structural integrity while the wings and engines, made of materials hundreds if not thousands of times stronger, completely dissolved without a trace.
The fuselage contains a great volume of items other than the fuselage
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
What blows me away is there’s actually commenters who believe there was a plane. I thought it was common knowledge there was no plane.
load more comments
(6 replies)
what the fuck is this footage? Is my player glitching??