this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
386 points (96.6% liked)

Skeptic

1293 readers
1 users here now

A community for Scientific Skepticism:

Scientific skepticism or rational skepticism, sometimes referred to as skeptical inquiry, is a position in which one questions the veracity of claims lacking empirical evidence.

Do not confuse this with General Skepticism, Philosophical Skepticism, or Denialism.

Things we like:

Things we don't like:

Other communities of interest:

"A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence." -David Hume

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It forgot, “well there’s nothing we can do about it now!”

[–] 6mementomori@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"but it's just the corporations' fault!"

[–] JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago

And then call it socialism for wanting to hold them accountable

[–] NotAPenguin@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So many people absolutely refuse to change their own destructive habits and justify it with "corporations tho!" like they just pollute for fun and not to produce goods and services consumers buy.

Refusing to give them your money by changing your habits to be less destructive is a great way to hold them accountable, while advocating and voting for regulation of course.

[–] zalack@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

While I get what you are saying, individual responsibility only gets us so far. We need societal-level change, and holding corporations accountable isn't just about reigning in their direct pollution. Corporations control what choices that we as consumers even have. Regulating them so that we can only pick from a variety of good choices -- or at least so that the bad choices are more expensive / effort -- has a much higher impact than getting individuals to make good choices when bad choices are easily available, cheaper, and easier.

[–] CrunchyBoy@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

This isn't funny. I'm not saying it's not good. I'm just saying I need to cry now.

[–] rusticus1773@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This comic makes me want a benevolent alien life form to exterminate all humans and let evolution try again.

[–] Holodeck_Moriarty@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] zalack@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

That's what they said?

[–] rambaroo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

If they've been watching us long enough they know that's a waste of time. About half the population of the US wouldn't believe in climate change if God himself said it was real.

[–] Dicska@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I don't see why you would need an alien life form for that. Humans are doing it already.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 2 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, the classic sort of aliens who exterminate other civilizations, being benevolent is of course how you'd characterize them.

[–] rambaroo@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn't there some guy testifying about UFOs in Congress this week? We can only hope aliens see earth as a rare and valuable resource that we're fucking up so maybe they'll take it from us.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A lot of politicians just chase distractions...

There's always some nutjob wanting to testify to congress about aliens, and nutjobs in office eager to get the important shit out of the news cycle.

[–] rambaroo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Sounds accurate

load more comments
view more: next ›