390
submitted 2 months ago by finitebanjo@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mercano@lemmy.world 107 points 2 months ago

Sad, from a nostalgia point of view, but probably a win, environmentally. We have a pipeline to recycle plastic bottles, the mylar pouches are pretty much all single use.

[-] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 116 points 2 months ago

We actually don’t have a pipeline to recycle plastic bottles though, right?

[-] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 41 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Bottle deposit systems are generally effective. In Sweden, 90-95% of the pet plastic in drink bottles makes it back to a factory to be used as raw material for new bottles. We don't really recycle the hdpe lids or polyester labels, though.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago

Why aren't we just using glass, as we did for decades just fine.

[-] Creat@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 2 months ago

That's not actually a solution when talking single-use either. Remaking the bottles from recycled glass is incredibly energy intensive and not an environmentally friendly process either. Multi-use bottles are much better, but the cleaning required also isn't that simple and also relatively energy intensive (far from remaking the bottles of course).

There's also practical downsides to glass (heavy, breakable), but those are subjective and their relevance highly depends on the use case.

Ideally, we wouldn't buy stuff to drink in any kind of bottle, but just use tap water. possibly just buy some concentrated stuff to then make your actual drink at home. Nothing beats the effectiveness of transporting water through a simple pipe, but that isn't even possible everywhere in the world due to drinking water quality issues...

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ABCDE@lemmy.world 34 points 2 months ago

But much better to use aluminium.

[-] squozenode@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

At least aluminum actually is recyclable.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Melonpoly@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 17 points 2 months ago

Recycling bin > recycling lorry > container > third world country > sea.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 68 points 2 months ago

Oh no. I can’t relive the childhood frustration of being unable to access that sweet nectar shielded behind an impenetrable puncture-proof material with no tools to work with but the flimsiest of mini plastic straws.

[-] thelsim@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 months ago

I don’t know about over there, but here they’ve started selling them with paper straws. Making it even more impossible to puncture that stupid little hole while ruining the straw in the process.

And of course it’s the only thing my daughter wants to drink. I’ve had to resort to using a nail file to open those things.

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I hate paper straws. There are many different compostable straws and paper is about the worst.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

Skill issue. You could always penetrate the tiny hole with your canines if you were adamant enough

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 11 points 2 months ago

Then you push hard enough to punch through, and the straw goes straight out the back too.

[-] Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

That was the worst. I loved it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] paultimate14@lemmy.world 63 points 2 months ago

I see a ton of comments here hating on nostalgic people, with no actual nostalgic people in sight yet.

Personally I don't care if a pouched drink exists or not, but if they are no longer producing pouched drinks they should probably retire the brand.

Do you remember what a CapriSun tastes like? It's somewhere between an extremely-artificially flavored "juice" concentrate and a "fruit flavored" drink like Kool-Aid. The whole appeal was the packaging.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 months ago

This is absolutely reeks of a bullshit "OMG the sky must be falling for you" condescending article from an older generation that thinks younger nostalgia is silly. I wouldn't give this article any more credence than a boomer yelling "Avocado Toast!" at you when you're enjoying a nice brunch. It's just needlessly sensationalist shit stirring.

[-] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago

It's quite literally a bit of orange juice, filled up with water and loaded with sugar.

[-] paultimate14@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

It also includes flavoring (of which the orange juice is one). They come in more flavors than just orange.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 49 points 2 months ago

Plastic bottles in general should be illegal. It's cans, glass bottles, or GTFO when it comes to beverages for me.

[-] isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de 35 points 2 months ago

FYI cans have a plastic liner to prevent acidic foods from dissolving the aluminium, so there's still some plastic in it (much less then fully plastic bottles tho)

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Ah, but without plastic bottles how would we generate additional profits from the excess waste of oil production?

[-] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 months ago

Glass has the best taste too, because it is almost totally chemically inert, you don't get the odd flavor changes that you do with aluminum cans or plastic bottles.

[-] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 months ago

Good, the packages can't even be recycled. Corporations should be held liable for their plastic waste contributions via the packaging.

[-] paultimate14@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago

You think the bottles are going to be any better? They're going to end up in the ocean with all of the other plastic bottles from other drinks.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] PineRune@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago

I very specifically remember the controversy 15-20 years ago when it was found that many of these pouches had mold in them, and you couldn't see it because of the pouch or even taste it. I'm sure the quality control since then has improved, but any time I see a pouch of juice, I think about that mold incident.

[-] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

Is that why some brands made the back of the pouch transparent?

[-] PineRune@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

I would assume so. I would also think a lot of people just aren't comfortable consuming something that they can't see.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago

I have always, for the entirety of their existence, hated those dumb pouches. Good riddance as far as I'm concerned.

[-] spyd3r@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 months ago

They made a really loud noise in the lunchroom if you inflated the pouch all the way, folded over the straw to seal it, then stomped on it really hard with your shoe. This was before mentally deranged people started shooting up schools though, so maybe don't try it.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 23 points 2 months ago

In the United States, Kraft and its former parent company, the tobacco conglomerate Philip Morris Cos. (now Altria), have successfully marketed Capri Sun using strategies developed for selling cigarettes to children.[2] American parents often misidentify Capri Sun as healthy, and it is one of the most favorably rated brands among Generation Z Americans.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capri-Sun

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Right? But this only applies to Capri Sun. If it were Hi-C, you’d demand a juice box.

Also, the people who are currently in their childhood absolutely do not care. It’s just us 40+ curmudgeons that must drink Capri Sun from a pouch, Hi-C from a tiny box, and Sunny D straight from that wonky-shaped jug that won’t fit in the fridge door.

[-] ahal@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 months ago

I dunno.. Anytime my kids see these pouches at a store, they beg us for them. We've never bought them at home either. I think kids just like the novelty of drinking out of a bag.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] _lilith@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

shit rots your teeth anyway

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69zaM1ImvUE

The least they could do is shift to metal cans ffs.

[-] TwentySeven@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

The article doesn't actually say they are phasing out pouches, just that they are introducing bottles.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

I don't care about the nostalgia, but they are going to stop being easy to squeeze into a lunchbox now, so I'll find a different brand.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

They need to go the other way. More drinks in pouches. Cocktails for adults.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Zier@fedia.io 11 points 2 months ago
load more comments (12 replies)
[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Now this is a controversial thread

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
390 points (90.6% liked)

News

23260 readers
3751 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS