326
submitted 4 months ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 317 points 4 months ago

The only people who would say this are people that don’t know programming.

LLMs are not going to replace software devs.

[-] lemmyuser100002@lemmy.world 134 points 4 months ago

Wrong, this is also exactly what people selling LLMs to people who can't code would say.

[-] APassenger@lemmy.world 51 points 4 months ago

It's this. When boards and non-tech savvy managers start making decisions based on a slick slide deck and a few visuals, enough will bite that people will be laid off. It's already happening.

There may be a reckoning after, but wall street likes it when you cut too deep and then bounce back to the "right" (lower) headcount. Even if you've broken the company and they just don't see the glide path.

It's gonna happen. I hope it's rare. I'd argue it's already happening, but I doubt enough people see it underpinning recent lay offs (yet).

[-] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 33 points 4 months ago

AI as a general concept probably will at some point. But LLMs have all but reached the end of the line and they're not nearly smart enough.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I can see the statement in the same way word processing displaced secretaries.

There used to be two tiers in business. Those who wrote ideas/solutions and those who typed out those ideas into documents to be photocopied and faxed. Now the people who work on problems type their own words and email/slack/teams the information.

In the same way there are programmers who design and solve the problems, and then the coders who take those outlines and make it actually compile.

LLM will disrupt the programmers leaving the problem solvers.

There are still secretaries today. But there aren't vast secretary pools in every business like 50 years ago.

[-] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago

It'll have to improve a magnitude for that effect. Right now it's basically an improved stack overflow.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 132 points 4 months ago

It’ll replace brain dead CEOs before it replaces programmers.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 38 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I'm pretty sure I could write a bot right now that just regurgitates pop science bullshit and how it relates to Line Go Up business philosophy.

Edit: did it, thanks ChatJippity

def main():
    # Check if the correct number of arguments are provided
    if len(sys.argv) != 2:
        print("Usage: python script.py <PopScienceBS>")
        sys.exit(1)
    # Get the input from the command line
    PopScienceBS = sys.argv[1]
    # Assign the input variable to the output variable
    LineGoUp = PopScienceBS
    # Print the output
    print(f"Line Go Up if we do: {LineGoUp}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
    main()
[-] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 38 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)
if lineGoUp {

    CollectUnearnedBonus()

} else {

   FireSomePeople()
   CollectUnearnedBonus()

}
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] casmael@lemm.ee 100 points 4 months ago

I know just enough about this to confirm that this statement is absolute horseshit

[-] ghostface@lemmy.world 39 points 4 months ago

Sounds like the no-ops of a decade ago and cloud will remove the need for infrastructure engineers. 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂😂😂🤣

[-] ChapulinColorado@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

SHUT UP AND GO BACK TO OUR SHITTY YAML BASED INFRASTRUCTURE!

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] piecat@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago

It isn't that AI will have replaced us in 24 months, it's that we will be enslaved in 24 months. Or in the matrix. Etc.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] dinckelman@lemmy.world 84 points 4 months ago

I'll take "things business people dont understand" for 100$.

No one hires software engineers to code. You're hired to solve problems. All of this AI bullshit has 0 capability to solve your problems, because it can only spit out what it's already ~~stolen from~~ seen somewhere else

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 76 points 4 months ago

Guys that are putting billions of dollars into their AI companies making grand claims about AI replacing everyone in two years. Whoda thunk it

[-] aaaaace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 70 points 4 months ago

He who knows, does not speak. He who speaks, does not know.

--Lao Tzu...

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SomeGuy69@lemmy.world 65 points 4 months ago

But coding never was the difficult part. It's understanding a concept, identify a problem and solve it with the possible methods. An AI just makes the coding part faster and gives me options to quicker identify a possible solution. Thankfully there's a never ending pile of projects, issues, todos and stackholder wants, that I don't see how we need less programmers. Maybe we need more to deal with AI, as now people can do a lot more in house instead of outsourcing, but as soon as that threshold is reached, companies will again contact large software companies. If people want to put AI into everything, you need people feeding the AI with company specific data and instruct people to use this AI.

All I see is middle management getting replaced, because instead of a boring meeting, I could just ask an AI.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Kekzkrieger@feddit.org 63 points 4 months ago

CEOs without a clue how things work think they know how things work.

I swear if we had no CEOs from today on the only impact would be that we wouldve less gibberish being spoken

[-] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 31 points 4 months ago

If AI could replace anyone... it's those dingbats. I mean, what would you say, in this given example, the CEO does... exactly? Make up random bullshit? AI does that. Write a speech? AI does that. I love how these overpaid people think they can replace the talent but they... they are absolutely required and couldn't possibly be replaced! Talent and AI can't buy and enjoy the extra big yacht, or private jets, or over priced cars, or a giant over sized mansion... no you need people for that.

[-] qarbone@lemmy.world 61 points 4 months ago

If, 24 months from now, most people aren't coding, it'll be because people like him cut jobs to make a quicker buck. Or nickel.

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] hark@lemmy.world 61 points 4 months ago

This will be used as an excuse to try to drive down wages while demanding more responsibilities from developers, even though this is absolute bullshit. However, if they actually follow through with their delusions and push to build platforms on AI-generated trash code, then soon after they'll have to hire people to fix such messes.

[-] Trigger2_2000@sh.itjust.works 55 points 4 months ago

Of course they won't be; somebody has to debug all the crap AI writes.

[-] yokonzo@lemmy.world 55 points 4 months ago

How many times does the public have to learn if the CEO says it, he probably doesn't know what he's talking about. If the devs say it, listen

[-] riodoro1@lemmy.world 53 points 4 months ago

Todays news: Rich assholes in suits are idiots and don’t know how their own companies are working. Make sure to share what they’re saying.

[-] Tyfud@lemmy.world 52 points 4 months ago

Yeah, that's not going to happen.

[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 41 points 4 months ago

Yeah writing the code isn't really the hard part. It's knowing what code to write and how to structure it to work with your existing code or potential future code. Knowing where things might break so you can add the correct tests or alerts. Giving time estimates on how long it will take to build the parts of the system and building in phases to meet your teams needs.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] jon 45 points 4 months ago

Good luck debugging AI-generated code...

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] dsilverz@thelemmy.club 45 points 4 months ago

It's the same claim when tools like Integromat, WayScript, PureData, vvvv and other VPLs (Visual Programming Languages) started to get some hype. I once worked for a company that strongly believed they'd "retire the need for coding", and my ex-boss was so confident and happy about that... Although VPLs were a practical thing, time is the ruler of truth, and for every dev-related job vacancy I see, they ask some programming language, the written ones (JS, PHP, Python, Ruby, Lua, and so on).

Because if you look closely, deep inside, voila, there's code in anything that is claimed to be no-code! Wow, could anyone imagine that? 🤯 /sarcasm

[-] DumbAceDragon@sh.itjust.works 29 points 4 months ago

I made this meme a while back and I think it's relevant

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Fosheze@lemmy.world 45 points 4 months ago

A company I used to work for outsourced most of their coding to a company in India. I say most because when the code came back the internal teams anways had to put a bunch of work in to fix it and integrate it with existing systems. I imagine that, if anything, LLMs will just take the place of that overseas coding farm. The code they spit out will still need to be fixed and modified so it works with your existing systems and that work is going to require programmers.

[-] ammonium@lemmy.world 24 points 4 months ago

So instead of spending 1 day writing good code, we'll be spending a week debugging shitty code. Great.

[-] Zacryon@feddit.org 42 points 4 months ago

While I highly doubt that becoming true for at least a decade, we can already replace CEOs by AI, you know? (:

https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/ai-ceo-artificial-intelligence-b2302091.html

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 20 points 4 months ago

Most middle managers could be replaced by a simple script already.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] spacecadet@lemm.ee 41 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Everybody talks about AI killing programming jobs, but any developer who has had to use it knows it can’t do anything complex in programming. What it’s really going to replace is program managers, customer reps, makes most of HR obsolete, finance analysts, legal teams, and middle management. This people have very structured, rule based day to days. Getting an AI to write a very customized queuing system in Rust to suit your very specific business needs is nearly impossible. Getting AI to summarize Jira boards, analyze candidates experience, highlight key points of meetings (and obsolete most of them altogether), and gather data on outstanding patents is more in its wheelhouse.

I am starting to see a major uptick in recruiters reaching out to me because companies are starting to realize it was a mistake to stop hiring Software Engineers in the hopes that AI would replace them, but now my skills are going to come at a premium just like everyone else in Software Engineering with skills beyond “put a react app together”

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] EnderMB@lemmy.world 40 points 4 months ago

I feel sorry for all those people in AWS that now have him as a leader...

[-] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 39 points 4 months ago

24 months from now? Unlikely lol

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 38 points 4 months ago

If generative AI hasn't replaced artists, it won't replaced programmers.

Generative AI is much better at art than coding.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] TriflingToad@lemmy.world 37 points 4 months ago

Seriously how can these CEOs of a GPU company not talk to a developer. You have loads of them to interview

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sudo42@lemmy.world 36 points 4 months ago

Sure, Microsoft is happy to let their AIs scan everyone else’s code., but is anyone aware of any software houses letting AIs scan their in-house code?

Any lawyer worth their salt won’t let AIs anywhere near their company’s proprietary code intil they are positive that AI isn’t going to be blabbing the code out to every one of their competitors.

But of course, IANAL.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 34 points 4 months ago

Let's assume this is true, just for discussion's sake. Who's going to be writing the prompts to get the code then? Surely someone who can understand the requirements, make sure the code functions, and then test it afterwards. That's a developer.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 25 points 4 months ago

I seem to recall about 13 years ago when "the cloud" was going to put everyone in IT Ops out of a job. At least according to people who have no idea what the IT department actually does.

"The cloud" certainly had an impact but the one thing it definitely did NOT do was send every system and network admin to the unemployment office. If anything it increased the demand for those kinds of jobs.

I remain unconcerned about my future career prospects.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Nighed@sffa.community 24 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I'm going to call BS on that unless they are hiding some new models with huge context windows...

For anything that's not boilerplate, you have to type more as a prompt to the AI than just writing it yourself.

Also, if you have a behaviour/variable that is similar to something common, it will stubbornly refuse to do what you want.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 21 points 4 months ago

I'm curious about what the "upskilling" is supposed to look like, and what's meant by the statement that most execs won't hire a developer without AI skills. Is the idea that everyone needs to know how to put ML models together and train them? Or is it just that everyone employable will need to be able to work with them? There's a big difference.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] yournamehere@lemm.ee 18 points 4 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 17 points 4 months ago

If you go forward 12 months the AI bubble will have burst. If not sooner.

Most companies who bought into the hype are now (or will be soon) realizing it's nowhere near the ROI they hoped for, that the projects they've been financing are not working out, that forcing their people to use Copilot did not bring significant efficiency gains, and more and more are realizing they've been exchanging private and/or confidential data with Microsoft and boy there's a shitstorm gathering on that front.

load more comments (3 replies)

Says the person who is primarily paid with Amazon stock, wants to see that stock price rise for their own benefit, and won’t be in that job two years from now to be held accountable. Also, who has never written a kind of code. Yeah…. Ok. 🤮

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2024
326 points (92.4% liked)

Technology

60078 readers
3366 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS