335

GOP mayor blasts Trump and warns of 'hostile attacks' on cities if he's re-elected (www.rawstory.com)

submitted 3 months ago by solsangraal@lemmy.zip to c/politics@lemmy.world

37 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 38 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 105 points 3 months ago

"During the Trump administration, cities were largely ignored, during the Biden administration, we have enjoyed a good relationship and we have seen record investment in our communities and we are seeing economic prosperity as a result of that," he elaborated. ...

"... Again, we would go back to being largely ignored and really, even more than that, the subject of hostile attacks from the federal government. And so I thought in the best interest of my city it was important that I speak up; silence in this situation was not an option."

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 111 points 3 months ago

Imagine putting your duty to your constituents over your duty to the party.

[-] BingBong@sh.itjust.works 43 points 3 months ago

Agree with you, but "duty to party" shouldn't exist and it's sad that it does.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 months ago

Especially considering his position is a municipal one, not State or Federal one...

[-] Plopp@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Clearly he's a communist!!

[-] YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Antifa too!!

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

Why is this guy a republican? Is he under duress?

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 30 points 3 months ago

honestly i don't even know what the republican "ideal" is anymore, since it seems to me to be nothing more than "do whatever the 1% wants" for the last 20+ years

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Some of the ideals they claimed to follow weren't necessarily bad. Fiscal conservatism isn't inherently a bad thing, the problem is that Republicans were highly selective about when they cared about it.

[-] VerdantSporeSeasoning@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago

Fiscal conservatism should have never been conflated with severe austerity. Starve the government is a bad plan, thanks so much Grover Norquist 😤

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Completely agree.

Balanced budget, working away the debt, making sure you don't run a deficit? All totally sensible. But you do that by making the government more efficient and raising tax revenue, not slashing funding willy nilly

[-] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 months ago

Let's not confuse conservatives with Trump supporters. "Republican" is an outdated label.

Although I don't agree with a lot of "conservative" policies, I respect people with conservative views who advocate for those views respectfully and in good faith, where their only crime is to be a bit misguided.

The Trump movement, meanwhile, is just a naked power grab by everyone involved. Absolutely nothing redeeming there.

[-] vanontom@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

"Conservatives" have a very important choice to make this November. They could've ended this insanity a while ago, but keep choosing their old team instead (who barely bother anymore with traditionally conservative legislation).

The T**** cult looks more like the Taliban (religious fundamentalists, extremists... terrorists) with every new revelation we non-weirdos learn (from the likes of Jeffrey Dahmer Vance, Project 2025, etc). I would not doubt a bunch of them have now actually embraced The Handmaid's Tale. They are more dangerous than ever, and are one election away from achieving their goals, against the will of the majority of the country. It will be devastating.

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The non-maga conservatives created this situation. They've knowingly voted for bigots and fascists for the last 30+ years. What do you call someone who repeatedly votes for fascists?

Conservatives are completely responsible for maga and for the state of the conservative party. Conservatives did this. A small minority of them may now regret it, but they are still 100% responsible for all of this.

[-] P00ptart@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

You don't deserve the upvotes you've got. There is no position that allows freedom from that side. There is no excuse for siding with the domestic terrorist. None. There's respect for siding with Republicans stepping down to avoid his bullshit, but there should be no sympathy for people who vote for trump or his supporters in any way.

[-] RBWells@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

A Republican mayor is different category somehow, at least where I live we tend to alternate and unfailingly it goes like this:

Democratic mayor works on infrastructure, storm drains, water pipes, things you can't see. Some social programs too, down payment assistance, e-bike vouchers, tree giveaways, funds for low income housing.

Republican mayor courts business, works on the superficial beautification of the city, showy things like stadiums, funnels tax money to companies more than to individuals. Tax breaks for hiring locals, rather than trying to push the money straight back to us.

I kind of think we need a little of that, but not sure why it gets labeled fiscally conservative.

[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

~~GOP~~ RINO mayor blasts Trump and warns of 'hostile attacks' on cities if he's re-elected

ftfy

-- #maga

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 37 points 3 months ago

GOP RINO woke unamerican satanic mayor blasts Trump and warns of ‘hostile attacks’ on cities if he’s re-elected

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

“Mayor Satan, I call him. He hates Jesus. Everybody says so. Many such cases. Sad really.”

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 3 points 3 months ago

We don't need to amplify their falsehoods.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

The hostile attacks are coming either way at this point.

[-] Daxtron2@startrek.website 10 points 3 months ago

If you haven't already, learn to defend yourself and your home.

[-] P00ptart@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Red hat terrorists exist on a level that America hasn't seen before.

[-] Daxtron2@startrek.website 1 points 2 months ago

Yep, hard to protect against a coordinated attack but it's still good to know what to do in the more likely scenarios.

[-] recapitated@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

This might sound nice in our echo chamber, but let's just take a moment to remember that there are a fuckton of mayors in this country... Including straight up pageantry powerless do nothing positions.

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Your conservative neighbors, coworkers and family may offer you smiles and politeness, but they will absolutely not mourn your loss if you or your family are killed by other conservatives. Empathy is simply not a conservative trait. This is team sports to them and you are not on their team.

Conservatives might not all be training or planning to attack the normal people, but many of them are. Many of them may be people you know. Be ready.

[-] dezmd@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

"Burn_The_Right"

Rabid partisan politics can affect anyone to the point of advocating violence, as it obviously has done to you. You are acting as a provocateur, trying to reinforce an expectation of violence.

You say empathy is not a conservative trait, then demonstrate your own lack of empathy.

You say they see this as a team sports delusion, then treat it like one yourself. Every perosn has individual thoughts and decision matrixes, even the dipshit MAGAs. If you engaged with empathy rather than fear and arrogance, you'd be able to articulate a warning without that all or nothing doomer rhetoric.

You've becone the same monster you are scared of.

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

hey, just because one side

keeps threatening with violence,
keeps brandishing weapons as a threat of violence,
actually commits violence,
fantasizes and talks about secession,
is proud of previous attempts of secession and the civil war they lost,
actually tried to violently overthrow the government and hang the vice president,
supports and celebrates state violence,
advocates for more state violence against minorities,

... doesn't mean that all of a sudden you can say they want to commit violence, you monster!

[-] dezmd@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

That's obviously not what I was saying and not how I was saying it, and you know it.

Perhaps if you weren't so locked and loaded to attack anything not tightly fit into your bubble you'd react with reasonable questions and discussion as a response instead of trying to play gotcha nonsense.

When their entire account persona I was replying to is based around countering MAGA violence with more implied violence while not providing alternative solutions or even ideas, they're just acting as another side of the same coin of the asshole MAGAs that we rail against.

Remain calm, the MAGA gravy seals are not as worthy of the panic inducing threat category you fear they are in.

[-] adarza@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 months ago

dude is sooooo close...

yet still so far away.

[-] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Feeds and helps leopards grow into face ripping killing predators, warns people leopards are coming like it was some unforeseeable consequence of their own bs.

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago

Raw Story - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for Raw Story:

MBFC: High - Left - High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.News

Search topic on Ground.News

~Media~ ~Bias~ ~Fact~ ~Check~ ~|~ ~bot~ ~support~

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 16 points 3 months ago

thank you for condensing the format--it's refreshing to notice that someone's listening

[-] breakingcups@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

I preferred the previous format. Bytes are cheap and it's not intuitive what "High - left - high" means.

[-] Plopp@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

I assumed they meant the unexpanded posts. They took up annoyingly amounts of space with the unnecessary line breaks before.

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 months ago

true. if it was my bot i'd make it just a simple "credibility: high; high bias to the left" with a link to the info page. gotta love works in progress

[-] Phegan@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I liked the other format better, honestly, it was easier to get information from.

this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024

335 points (96.9% liked)

politics

19136 readers

3659 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News