129
submitted 3 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 108 points 3 months ago

Are the trans kids allowed to sue for same? If they don't feel safe with the tiny cis-bigots, can they sue for a bathroom(s) of their own?

Bigotry is not genetic, it is learned. I question the morality of their parents, their community leaders, to a lesser extent their teachers, and to a larger extent their school admin and school board.

[-] earlgrey0@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 months ago
[-] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago

I wish 15 year old me had a gay bathroom. Would have saved so much terror getting beat up for existing.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 months ago

Honestly, I'm so fucking disappointed we don't just have larger mixed gender bathrooms. It would have made things so much more comfortable growing up.

[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 50 points 3 months ago

"allowed to sue" just means they can try it - doesn't mean they've actually got a shot. Let's see what their case looks like...

“Petitioner is a practicing Catholic who believes that God created each person as male or female, that the complementary sexes reflect the image of God, that sex cannot be altered, and that rejection of one’s biological sex is a rejection of the image of God in that person,” the lawsuit reads.

Not gonna say it won't work, cuz our courts are dumb as shit sometimes, but she's literally asking a judge to enforce her religion on another student. That's unconstitutional as fuck.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 22 points 3 months ago

That last line is hilariously irrelevant.

No one gives a fuck if your god is offended except you!

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

This is America. Don't be so sure.

[-] Lookorex@lemm.ee 14 points 3 months ago

Like that's been stopping anyone

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Petitioner is a practicing bigot who wants to abuse secular courts to force everyone to follow the rules set out in their favorite fan fiction.

Any judge siding with petitioner would be in violation of their oath to uphold the constitution and as such should be immediately impeached, disrobed* and disbarred.

*no, not in that way, ya perv! 😛

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 41 points 3 months ago

Why do you care who shits in the stall next to you?

The only reason I care about another person being in the bathroom with me is that they sometimes think it's okay to talk to me in there. It is not.

[-] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

Because boys/mens rooms dont get just stalls, they have to stand side by side and pee in a trough sometimes, privacy is forbidden

IMO just make all bathrooms gender neutral and put stalls in all mens rooms

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Have you ever looked down to see what the person next to you is peeing with? I haven’t, nor do I know why I should care. I’m pissing next to them, not fucking them.

[-] MenacingPerson@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago

People like that do exist. Maybe not me and you.

[-] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Those people are weird.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Why should their delicate sensibilities be catered to?

Also, if someone was checking out my penis while I was pissing, that would be highly inappropriate, especially in a school.

[-] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Why shouldnt men be afforded the same privacy as women?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

You mean like putting a divider between urinals? Because that already exists as an option. Then no one can look at your precious little Mr. Happy.

Trans men generally use a stall anyway, what with usually lacking what they need in order to use a urinal.

And plenty of cis men also sit down in a stall if they need to urinate.

So men do have that privacy. Even trans men. The problem here is that you don't think trans men are men.

[-] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You mean like putting a divider between urinals? Because that already exists as an option.

Sometimes, and even then its usually paltry as an actual intrusion-prevention-device> The funniest is when there is a mirror directly across from the urinals, dividers dont do shit then lol

Trans men generally use a stall anyway, what with usually lacking what they need in order to use a urinal.

I know OP is about trans, but Ive not mentioned anything regardging cis/trans because imo it doesnt matter. everyone should have the same right to privacy in a bathroom, therefore gender neutral bathrooms make a lot of sense.

And plenty of cis men also sit down in a stall if they need to urinate.

True! But there are inherently less stalls in a mens room BECAUSE of the urinals.

So men do have that privacy. Even trans men. The problem here is that you don’t think trans men are men.

Again, this has nothing to do with trans, youre shoving that into my comments.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -5 points 3 months ago

I have no idea what your issue is if it isn't about trans people in bathrooms. It sounds like you just want more stalls. Okay.

[-] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Re-read my original comment

[-] MenacingPerson@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

It's not about catering to them. It's about preventing them from being fucking creeps.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Sorry... you're saying trans people should be barred from the bathroom of their gender because cis people can be creeps?

[-] MenacingPerson@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

No. I said nothing about that.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Then I'm not sure what your point is.

[-] ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 months ago

True, there are pecker checkers out there. And they are the biggest fucking weirdos.

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

"Nice watch."

[-] Binette@lemmy.ml 30 points 3 months ago

Who goes in the toilet, realizes their trans classmate is in there, and think: "Hmmm. I think I should sue them" other than a bully lol.

[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

I'm more about equality, I'd like to avoid sharing restrooms with anyone.

[-] DBT@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Cisgender students in VA given the green light to be real fucking snowflakes in the flesh.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 3 months ago

Snowflakes.

[-] metaStatic@kbin.earth 6 points 3 months ago

Who you share the restroom with is less of a problem than the fact you have to share in the first place

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Is sharing it a problem? I didn't realize there was any sort of issue with the existence of public restrooms.

[-] Korne127@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

What the fuck… disgusting

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

The Advocate Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)

The Advocate is rated with High Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.

Bias: Left
Factual Reporting: High
Country: United States of America
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/advocate/

Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News


Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.

Footer

Media Bias Fact Check is a fact-checking website that rates the bias and credibility of news sources. They are known for their comprehensive and detailed reports.

Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.

this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
129 points (93.3% liked)

News

23305 readers
3619 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS