427
submitted 1 month ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Doctored campaign video featuring US vice-president reposted by Tesla chief executive watched 128m times

Kamala Harris’s election campaign has accused Elon Musk of spreading “manipulated lies” after the Tesla chief executive posted a doctored video featuring the vice-president on his X account.

Musk reposted a manipulated Harris campaign video on Friday evening in which a fake Harris voiceover says: “I was selected because I am the ultimate diversity hire,” and that anyone who criticises her is “both sexist and racist”.

The video has been viewed 128m times on Musk’s account after the world’s richest man posted it with the words “this is amazing” followed by a laughing emoji. Musk owns X, which he rebranded from Twitter last year.

Amy Klobuchar, a Democrat senator, accused Musk of violating the platform’s guidelines. According to X’s synthetic and manipulated media policy, users are barred from sharing “synthetic, manipulated, or out-of-context media that may deceive or confuse people and lead to harm” although allowances are made for satire provided it does not “cause significant confusion about the authenticity of the media”.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 86 points 1 month ago

i long for the day i never hear about musk or twitter ever again

[-] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 68 points 1 month ago

Why do we have to say “accused” when he did it in public?

[-] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

Because he's a fragile, litigious, snowflake of a billionaire that cannot even contemplate that anything he does is wrong, let alone illegal.

[-] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 1 month ago

You and I don't have to say it but journalist standards are different. https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Journalism_ethics_and_standards

[-] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Thanks for that

Reporters are expected to be as accurate as possible given the time allotted to story preparation and the space available and to seek reliable sources. Properly using their sources and using accurate quoting and use of words from interview or conversation.[19]

If you saw where he published it on the website that he owns, the most accurate description would be to say he did it. The average person would understand the true level of uncertainty that way. Whereas if you use uncertainty in your description you are, in fact, misinforming the reader.

Reporting the truth is almost never libel,[23] which makes accuracy very important.

Just saying

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 63 points 1 month ago

The Democratic governor of California, Gavin Newsom, posted on X on Sunday evening that the manipulated Harris video should be “illegal” and that he would soon sign a bill banning such media, in apparent reference to a proposal supported by California lawmakers to ban “materially deceptive” election deepfakes.

I don't know why they're still on Twitter

If everyone except the right-wing trolls leave, then the whole platform dies quickly.

[-] FelixCress@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

I don't know why they're still on Twitter

Presumably lack of viable mainstream alternative. Looking at Musk management there won't be a Twitter in a few years though.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

Well an alternative won't appear as long as people are still sheltering in the corpse of Twitter. I think Mastadon and Blue Sky together will end up holding that torch.

[-] FelixCress@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Well an alternative won't appear as long as people are still sheltering in the corpse of Twitter

I am not disagreeing with you - I am not using twitter for ages, even before Musk due to their stance on the genocide of Palestinians. I can however see why the politicians do.

[-] skizzles@lemmy.ml 45 points 1 month ago

So why can't we call this what it is.

An attempt at election interference and throw his ass in prison for treason. For such a high profile person it should be considered no less.

[-] 242@lemmy.cafe 34 points 1 month ago

“I was selected because I am the ultimate diversity hire,”

In truth it's lame ass white dudes who are the kids of rich men who benefit from the system and are handed positions way above their level. Black women have to work their asses off to even get their foot in the door. This "diversity hire" narrative is massive projection. Musk was born on third base and got walked in for the score.

[-] teamevil@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago

No shit...he called a guy trying to save folks in a cave a pedo because his ego was offended.

[-] Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 month ago

I feel like being witnessed posting from his own personal account with no remorse or claim of account hijacking warrants a bit more of a strongly worded statement than merely "accused".

[-] nifty@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The video is possibly illegal in several states https://www.citizen.org/article/tracker-legislation-on-deepfakes-in-elections/

Edit maybe there should be more election deepfakes so that we’ll finally have legislation outlawing this behavior

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

According to X’s synthetic and manipulated media policy

I honestly thought that they were describing the POLICY as synthetic and manipulated.

You know, because interpretation and enforcement is entirely dependent on whether you agree with Apartheid Emerald Boy on everything..

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago
[-] paw@feddit.org 6 points 1 month ago

https://lemmy.ml/post/18539657

In the context of him sharing a fake video. 🤦‍♀️

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

The Guardian Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [Medium] (Click to view Full Report)

The Guardian is rated with Medium Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.

Bias: Left-Center
Factual Reporting: Mixed
Country: United Kingdom
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-guardian/

Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News:
- https://ground.news/find?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Ftechnology%2Farticle%2F2024%2Fjul%2F29%2Felon-musk-accused-of-spreading-lies-over-kamala-harris-video


Media Bias Fact Check is a fact-checking website that rates the bias and credibility of news sources. They are known for their comprehensive and detailed reports.

Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.

Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.

[-] samokosik@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Twitter is donald’s « Truth » v2

[-] RandomVideos@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

At least truth social is(forced to be) open source

[-] rageagainstmachines@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Elon? Lying? For his own benefit? No way

[-] N0body@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

In his defense, Elon both owns the platform and is a giant manbaby throwing a neverending tantrum at even the thought of rules applying to him.

this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2024
427 points (97.8% liked)

News

22876 readers
3809 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS