this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2024
316 points (97.9% liked)

News

37418 readers
1713 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A circuit judge, an appellate court and the Missouri Supreme Court agree that a woman whose murder conviction was overturned should be free after 43 years in prison.

Yet Sandra Hemme is still behind bars, leaving her lawyers and legal experts puzzled.

“I’ve never seen it,” said Michael Wolff, a former Missouri Supreme Court judge and professor and dean emeritus of Saint Louis University Law School. “Once the courts have spoken, the courts should be obeyed.”

The lone holdup to freedom for the 64-year-old woman is opposition from Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey, who has filed court actions seeking to force her to serve additional years for decades-old prison assault cases. The warden at the Chillicothe Correctional Center has declined to let Hemme go, based on Bailey’s actions.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 69 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Punishing a person for protecting themselves in a violent hell-hole that she would not have been in if she hadn't been put there wrongly by the state is seriously fucked up. She almost has a case for entrapment. If the state had not put her in prison, she would not have had the means, the motive, nor the opportunity to commit the crime. And since she was wrongly put there, the state should be liable for any crimes committed.

[–] TeoTwawki@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I think that attorney general should have to walk in her shoes for a bit and then have someone hold up his release

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 18 points 2 years ago

Rarely does one ascend to positions of profound influence with the capacity for empathy.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 2 years ago

That’s entirely too logical. Repubs hate their constituents. They hate women. He’s (AG) doing the only thing he knows how: punishing someone weaker than him.

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 41 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Keeping people proven innocent in prison should be a massively punishable offence

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

massively punishable offense

Hear, hear.

Everyone involved in blocking or preventing her release should get prison time and lifetime ban from working in legal, law enforcement, public service.

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Man, we can't even convict an ex-president for all the crimes he committed while in office. I have little hope in any justice these days.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago

It's like some people wake up in the morning and ask themselves "How can I be the worst person?"

Sadly for the rest of us, the answer to that question one day was "run for office"

[–] jettrscga@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Bailey, who was appointed attorney general ... has a history of opposing overturning convictions, even when local prosecutors cite evidence of actual innocence.

In 2023, Bailey’s office argued against then-St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner’s effort to overturn the murder conviction of Lamar Johnson, who was imprisoned 28 years. A St. Louis judge sided with Johnson, who was freed.

Bailey’s office also argued in court in May against freeing Christopher Dunn, who has spent 33 years in prison for a 1990 killing that St. Louis Circuit Attorney Gabe Gore determined that Dunn probably didn’t commit. A judge is still deciding that case.

And Bailey is opposing St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney Wesley Bell’s effort to set aside the murder conviction of Marcellus Williams. A hearing is Aug. 21 — just a month before Williams is scheduled to be executed. Testing unavailable at the time of the 1998 stabbing death found another person’s DNA on the knife, but not Williams’.

I would love to hear his justification for all of these. Is it just the for-profit prison money, or the pride of not being wrong?

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Or he could just be an asshole.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 4 points 2 years ago

Why not all three. An asshole who can't be wrong and enjoys getting kick backs from for profit prisons.

[–] Trigger2_2000@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

All the above

[–] OopsAllTwix@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago

Why not both?

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Just bc you didn't commit a crime doesn't mean you are free. - Supreme court

[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't know why you are criticizing the supreme Court here. They sided with them too. It's the AG who should be the target of public ire.

[–] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Prisons for profit is the entire problem.

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

In this case they are easy to appease. Just replace the woman the courts have ordered to be set free with the attorney general. They can even charge more since the piece of shit will need special accommodations.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 9 points 2 years ago

Slavery is alive and well.

[–] jadedwench@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Looks like she is out now! Yay!

[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

The frayed edge of our government...

[–] Steve@startrek.website 6 points 2 years ago

What are you in for? Resisting arrest…