146
How very american of them.
They learn from the best.
Naw, look at the actual cost of the fee they are complaining about and the total cost of the bill. If they want to get on America's level, they need to get those numbers up. That's rookie shit.
I use this very phrase as a response to poor customer service/poor behavior in general on a far too regular basis.
Oh my God to be in a situation where a $.70 charge at the hospital feels egregious I fucking wish. I have insurance and I had to pay a doctor hundreds for them to tell me the tendinitis in my wrist was caused by the two cigarettes I smoked at a party a month and a half ago. I hate it here y'all
But the US prides itself on being the poster child of capitalist dystopias, China likes to pretend it's a socialist country.
Ibn the US that would instead be 500$.
You're supposed to use a lighter
I spent about $3,000 for two different GI doctors to tell me they didn’t know what my issues were. One visit to a dietician and she said I should eat more food. 🤦🏻♂️
I would have told you that for $1500.
Amateurs! They should've charged $4000 and handed you some terrible "medical food" on the way out.
Sign you up for a goy slop subscription.
You know capitalist pigs love recurring revenue!!! Plus feeding you poison makes you sick! Win win
I don’t like this source:
Since the change of ownership in 2016, concerns have been raised about the paper's editorial independence and self-censorship. Critics including The New York Times, Der Spiegel, and The Atlantic have alleged that the paper is on a mission to promote China's soft power abroad.[9][10]
I don't like the source either, and usually I never link to SCMP or other Chinese propaganda media. In that case, however, I made an excemption (maybe it wasn't a good idea, just let me know that) as the article doesn't promote China's official agenda. The article is highly critical of the Chinese health system, even citing ordinary citizens' posts, and it comes from a paper like SCMP.
in this case I would have mentioned that in the post. Just so people are informed.
That's right. Done.
cheers! Thank you for the polite conversation on Lemmy. Which is unfortunately rare in politics/news communities :)
You are welcome 🤠
Please, Tankies, keep telling me how China is a communist country.
Look, if Americans could get this outraged over an 70 extra cents on a medical bill, we'd be a lot better off.
But in America, they'd bill us an extra $2,000 for the same, and we'd just add it to our debts and carry on without even burning down an insurance company like we should be doing.
Would you argue that medical bills would exist at all in a communist country? Because that was my point.
Agreed. I wonder how many of them have actually been to China. I have, and it's almost comically un-communist. Most western democracies have far more robust social supports, and I'd even say it's easier to have a worker-owned business in the west than in China.
So this is China's take on Facility fees. They just actually have the balls to list what the charge actually entailed.
Your archived link does not cover the whole article.
An official at the hospital in Yinchuan in Ningxia Hui autonomous region, northwestern China, said the fee was for two days’ use of a chair by the patient who was sitting on it while receiving an infusion.
$0.70 is a heck a lot cheaper than the consultation fees you get charged in a government subsidized medical institution in Singapore.
https://polyclinic.singhealth.com.sg/patient-care/charges-payment
Yeah, in the US they'd probably charge you $500, minimum.
this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
146 points (97.4% liked)
News
23276 readers
821 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS