242
submitted 4 months ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

One House Democrat said he spoke for others in the wake of the president’s stunningly feeble debate performance on Thursday: “The movement to convince Biden to not run is real.”

The House member, an outspoken defender of the president, said that House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer should consider “a combined effort” to nudge President Joe Biden out of the race.

Crestfallen by the president’s weak voice, pallid appearance and meandering answers, numerous Democratic officials said Biden’s bet on an early debate to rebut unceasing questions about his age had not only backfired but done damage that may prove irreversible. The president had, in the first 30 minutes of the debate, fully affirmed doubts about his fitness.

A second House Democrat said “reflection is needed” from Biden about the way ahead and indicated the private text threads among lawmakers were even more dire, with some saying outright that the president needed to drop out of the race.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Toastypickle@lemmy.world 96 points 4 months ago

We need ranked choice voting, and this 2 party system is complete bullshit and needs to go. Obviously, neither will happen, but it should.

[-] Liz@midwest.social 18 points 4 months ago

Just changing the voting system by itself won't get rid of the two party system, we also need proportional representation. I much prefer Approval Voting and Sequential Proportional Approval Voting because the results are as good, if not better than RCV, they're easier for the individual to understand, and it's impossible to submit an invalid ballot using either method. Plus RCV doesn't actually change the winner the vast majority of the time. Fargo and St. Louis both use approval voting and folks there appreciate being able to vote for everyone they like and know that their full ballot will always be counted.

[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

Just changing the voting system by itself won't get rid of the two party system

Not immediately, but it is a necessary condition. A third party really can't exist without ranked choice voting. If allows for a third party candidate to run without pissing everybody off.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Not_mikey@slrpnk.net 95 points 4 months ago

Bidens about to go down as one of the worst Democrats in the last century because of his hubris if he doesn't. His decent domestic agenda will be overshadowed by him ushering in another trump presidency by ignoring all the signs for him to drop out. He didn't early last year when polls repeatedly showed that people thought he was too old. He didn't when unnamed democrat was leading him by 10 points. He didn't when his Gaza policy alienated large chunks of his base. If he doesn't in the next couple weeks when there will probably be polls coming out showing majority support for him stepping down then he's gone full head in the sand.

It's like RBG all over again, if these people could just get it through there heads to quit while there ahead they could preserve a decent legacy, instead of tarnishing it by leading the way to a regressive order that overturns everything they've done.

[-] Seasm0ke@lemmy.world 49 points 4 months ago

Dont worry the DNC will find a way to blame Bernie for it

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 14 points 4 months ago

And lemmings and redditors will blame progressives for it.

[-] PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 4 months ago

I'm going to blame the people that have been trying to gaslight everyone into thinking that Biden was fine.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (32 replies)
[-] Xyre@lemmus.org 55 points 4 months ago

This is how Bernie can still win! /s

In the off chance they do replace him, they're going to force the worst possible candidate on us (Kamala?). Because what else are you going to do, let the bad guy win?

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 14 points 4 months ago
[-] bobburger@fedia.io 27 points 4 months ago

Newsome would have to resign as Governor and I'm not sure he wants to do that for a long shot presidential campaign.

Newsome polls very poorly against Trump and he also isn't very popular in his home state as Governor.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 51 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Really cool feeling when your state has primaries long after super Tuesday and the candidates were already mathematically locked in before you get a say. I swear I only get a chance to influence presidential primaries half the time or so. It's strange to watch a 'democracy' keep moving when sometimes your voice doesn't count because of where you're from.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] aleph@lemm.ee 50 points 4 months ago

Democrats have nobody to blame but themselves. They stayed mum for three and half years and now they’re reaping the whirlwind.

☝️

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 47 points 4 months ago

Stayed mum? They actively fought against allowing anyone to hold primaries.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

They did? That's weird I remember voting in them just like I do every 4 years.

[-] Count042@lemmy.ml 37 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

You weren't paying attention. Many states banned anyone else from the ballot, even though there wasn't cause for that by the rules.

There were no debates (Something that would have given Democratic party members time to decide if they thought Biden was electable.)

Some states were told their delegates wouldn't count.

There was no fair Democratic Party primary. If you think there was you were either not paying attention, or you didn't want a fair primary in the first place.

This problem is a problem of the Democratic Part{EDIT}y's own making.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] aleph@lemm.ee 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

That's the point - they closed ranks and kept riding the Biden train whilst quietly hoping that no one would notice it was in danger of coming off the rails.

https://theintercept.com/2024/06/28/biden-debate-dnc/

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org 41 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Shout out to the neoliberal dipshits who thought we needed another right-of-center incrementalist to beat Trump.

That one really fucking worked out...

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 31 points 4 months ago

Biden's big problem in the debate was that, for a few moments, he mumbled a confused answer that sounded like Donald Trump.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 28 points 4 months ago

It was a no-win situation. The DNC gave in - once again - to their republican-lite mindset of ‘capturing undecided voters’ and agreed to get socked in the face , twice, for absolutely no gain and everything to lose.

DNC consultants have always been morons, but now they’re morons-from-the-90s who still don’t understand what’s changed.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] big_slap@lemmy.world 31 points 4 months ago

"reflection is needed"

I hate being pessimistic, but they're gonna drag out "reflecting" for so long that they will lose the election.

if our elected officials are actually serious, they better act quickly on this because yesterday was extremely embarrassing. time will tell.

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 28 points 4 months ago

Remember when a huge coalition of people wanted RBG to retire? And then she didn't, and those people took it as courage or some such other virtue?

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] LordCrom@lemmy.world 24 points 4 months ago

Isn't it too late to get a new democrat as candidate anyway, right? I mean you need to register in all states before a deadline no?

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 20 points 4 months ago

There, a candidate must win support from the majority of "delegates" - party officials who formally choose the nominee. Delegates are assigned to candidates proportionally based on the results of each state's primary election. This year, Mr Biden won almost 99% of the nearly 4,000 delegates.

According to the DNC rules, those delegates are "pledged" to him, and are bound to support his nomination.

But if Mr Biden were to drop out, it would be a free-for-all. There is no official mechanism for him or anyone else in the party to choose his successor, meaning Democrats would be left with an open convention.

Presumably, Mr Biden would have some sway over his pledged delegates, but they would ultimately be free to do as they please.

That could lead to a frantic contest erupting among Democrats who want a shot at the nomination. Source

[-] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 12 points 4 months ago

2024 is going to be the year of frenzied elections with no preparation

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 11 points 4 months ago

I'm pretty sure he could step down and hand it to Kamala. Maybe he could even run as VP. That might rock the boat the least, and while I don't like Kamala, I have more faith in her to actually do the job.

[-] towerful@programming.dev 27 points 4 months ago

I always figured the role of president was more of a figure head.
I get the buck stops with them, they can do their veto and special powers thing, and I'm sure there are other "ultimately this is your decision" type things.
But it's the administration you are voting on.

I'm sure it feels amazing to have "that one guy" steering your country. But, I'm sure they mostly do what their advisors tell them to

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] card797@champserver.net 22 points 4 months ago

Biden drops out Trump wins. What is the point of this?

[-] addison@programming.dev 72 points 4 months ago

The point is that there is now a credible fear that if Biden does not drop out, Trump wins.

Replacing the candidate at the top of the ticket this late is a hail Mary, but it could bring unenthusiastic voters back into the Democratic tent.

[-] Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Trumps base is smaller, but passionate, they will show up. Biden doesn't really have followers, he has people that are just glad that he isn't Trump. But at this point it's embarrassing to even vote for him for that reason.... so people just won't show up to vote at all. All they have to do is have a sentient human that can complete a sentence and the hate for Trump will prevail. For the love of God. Do something DNC or Trump it is.

I just can't believe everyone is acting all surprised that the dude that could barely complete a sentence when he was 77 didn't get mysteriously better now that he's 81. Who woulda thought?...

We all know the DNC will do nothing, and Trump will win, and they are fine with it. Because they want to keep dragging this party to the right.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Trump wins if biden stays. I will vote for potato Biden before Trump, but I literally barely give a shit. The bar is literally so low and the democrats found a way to still struggle against a hated criminal. For the love of GOD, run someone else now. I will vote for anyone other than Trump but the LONG list of people that just want a sane person in there and currently won't vote for either will probably show up if a sentient human was an option.

New candidate, dems win. Sit around and do nothing, Trump wins. His smaller base is passionate. The democrats are pretty underwhelmed and embarrassed of Biden.

load more comments (33 replies)
[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 17 points 4 months ago

That's not guaranteed if Biden drops out before the DNC convention in August, where presumably another (possibly younger) candidate could be chosen.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

My prediction is that one of them doesn’t make it to Inauguration Day and the country panics as a result. Is likely? No. But on this timeline it makes the most sense

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 12 points 4 months ago

If Trump wins and dies before taking office would be a lot worse then Biden dieing.

Before Trump's body is even cold there would be endless amount of conspiracies that Democrats killed Trump. The only saving grace would be Trump's VP and other blood suckers all have diarrhea for brains and lack the charisma to take advantage of the situation.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 15 points 4 months ago

It's far too late for that, jackasses.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
242 points (83.8% liked)

News

23322 readers
3903 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS