297
submitted 4 months ago by schizoidman@lemmy.ml to c/news@lemmy.world
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Zier@fedia.io 54 points 4 months ago

Masks are not just for covid. Many people around the World wear masks when they feel ill for other reasons, and they also use them to counter bad air quality. America is pro-sickness. Having a healthy nation, and actual National Healthcare is almost illegal in the USA, not yet, but close. Republicans just want to control society and make money off of sick people.

[-] mecfs@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

Not to mention, for disabled people like me with specific illnesses including long covid, this basically means we can’t leave our homes without severe risk to our health. In essence, another ableist tactic to hide disability.

[-] fireweed@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Yeah I kinda suspect these anti-mask laws are going to be a disability lawsuit bonanza

[-] mecfs@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Republicans are doing everything possible to deny long covid is a thing. They are pushing the NIH to only fund research trying to (wrongly) make it seem like a mental disorder.

[-] Zier@fedia.io 2 points 4 months ago

That's because they don't want people to know that being a republican is a mental disorder, but we know, we know!

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

I got strept throat twice last season and both times went to the ER. I'm masking from like October to February.

[-] Kanzar@sh.itjust.works 42 points 4 months ago

I can just imagine how awkward dentist appointments are going to be...

[-] starcat@lemmy.world 37 points 4 months ago

I have a cold right now, and I needed to pick up some cough syrup to give me some relief. I wore a mask to prevent my illness from spreading to other people.

We should be normalizing this behaviour.

Do you want a summer cold? No. Me either. Wear a mask when you're sick.

[-] RagingSnarkasm@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago

“You can have my mask when you pry it from my cold, dead face.”

—Charlton Heston, probably

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago

They all get upset about masks, then a Charlottesville or January 6th event happens and then they stay quiet about masks for a while.

[-] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago
[-] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 months ago

shaving should come before haircuts.

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

Don't you hate pants?

[-] tal@lemmy.today 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

If you thought all the dumb controversy over masking that took place during the height of the COVID pandemic was finally behind us, think again.

Anti-masking laws were around well before COVID-19. I'd been talking about it due to stuff like the "burkini" controversy in France bringing up restrictions various countries had on clothing.

Plus discussion about mass facial recognition permitting tracking, and whether masks could counter that.

I also remember joking, at the start of the conflict, about how mask mandates conflicted with anti-masking laws.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-mask_law

There are anti-mask laws in many U.S. states and the District of Columbia.

New York State's anti-mask law was enacted in 1845, to provide for public safety after disputes between landlords and tenants.

Many anti-mask laws date back to the mid-20th century, when states and municipalities passed them to stop the violent activities of the Ku Klux Klan, whose members typically wore hoods of white linen to conceal their identities.

In the 21st century those laws have been applied to political protesters such as those affiliated with the Occupy Movement or Anonymous – wearing Guy Fawkes masks.

These laws have been challenged on the grounds that they violate the guarantees of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution to free speech and free association. Some courts have weighed freedom of speech against the public safety interest, and upheld such laws. For example, the Georgia Supreme Court found the law constitutional on the grounds that the wearing of the mask was an act of intimidation and a threat of violence, which is not protected speech. That law has exceptions for holiday celebrations, theatre performances, and occupational safety; the ruling makes it unclear if someone is violating the law if they wear a mask without the intent to threaten violence. A three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit upheld a New York law on the ground that wearing a Ku Klux Klan mask did not convey a protected message beyond that conveyed by wearing a hood and robe. Other courts have struck down anti-mask laws. For example, Tennessee and Florida state laws have been invalidated on the grounds that they were unconstitutionally broad. An ordinance in Goshen, Indiana, was struck down based on First Amendment doctrine that specifically protects anonymous speech and anonymous association, especially for unpopular groups like the KKK.

My own gut take is that across-the-board restrictions on wearing masks probably aren't necessary; the ability to track people is a lot more extensive than was the case when such laws went into place. And in 1950, companies had no prospect of, say, tying together camera networks and running facial recognition en masse. Today, that's a real possibility.

That being said, I think that unless social norms change so that a significant portion of people do wear masks, which I don't think is likely, elimination of anti-mask laws probably also isn't going to do much to avoid mass surveillance.

[-] AncientFutureNow@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

How about when mowing a dusty dry lawn or leaf blowing all those sycamore seeds. Without a mask I choke and cough and quit.

Also, these fucks equating health masks with actual masks used to hide identities is straight bullshit.

Then, we got that one place that carved out an exception for Klan members... Fuck. Fuck these assholes.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

How about if I want to paint my house?

[-] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

You'll huff those paint fumes and ENJOY IT, damn it!! /s

[-] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

There is genuinely zero reason to have this law

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

I wonder why it’s the deranged ones that are doing it.

this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
297 points (98.4% liked)

News

23322 readers
4354 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS