this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
322 points (97.6% liked)

News

37153 readers
1594 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nyahlathotep@sh.itjust.works 58 points 2 years ago (2 children)

"Yeah, but the perception..."

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

Jon Stewart last week pointed out the irony of Fox News being unable to handle this data, despite pushing the “facts don’t care about your feelings” mantra for years.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

The MSM is owned by big money just so they can use perception as a tool.

[–] Hikermick@lemmy.world 36 points 2 years ago (1 children)

According to the FBI crime has been on a steady decline since the late eighties. The Freakonomics guys credited things like higher incarceration and legalized abortion. Another factor others came up with is the removal of lead from gasoline. It happened not only in the US but other countries also. Apparently airborne lead isn't so healthy for young developing brains and the drop in crime began when people born at the time of the ban were reaching their adult years

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 2 years ago

The freakonomic guys are hacks that have no idea on how to do sociology or econometric analysis.

[–] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Kinda seems like crime spiked during the pandemic, and now it's actually just getting back to normal.

[–] btaf45@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Kinda seems like the crime rates has significantly dropped during literally every Dem president for the last 30 years. And that crime rates dropping when Dems are president is a very normal thing.

[–] BobGnarley@lemm.ee 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

So there's gonna be less cops, right?

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

What do you mean? We need to get those numbers UP! It just means more and more criminals are getting away with their crimes.

Now is EXACTLY when we need to be tough on crime!

/s

[–] btaf45@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Why would there be?

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Unless you watch Fox, then the world is coming to an end every time a stranger or an unknown car comes down your street. Especially if they have darker skin.

[–] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

They let them negros drive now in my amurikkka?

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's too hot to commit crime

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I know you're just making a joke, but usually crime spikes in the hotter months.

[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

The classic example of correlation≠causation

It's too cold to commit crime

[–] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 2 points 2 years ago

If The Wire and The Shield have taught me anything - it's that all the stats are cooked.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

When a felon can run to be a nation's leader one should likely question crime statistics for said nation.

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

One thing has literally nothing to do with the other, this was just a desperate attempt to inject your politics, lol.

How does the fact that a criminal is running for office serve as evidence against the legitimacy of statistics about the overall incidence of crime itself?