Bowman loses New York primary in blow to progressives (thehill.com)

submitted 4 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

30 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 31 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] theparadox@lemmy.world 31 points 4 months ago

I am just destroyed by this. I genuinely had a little faith in humanity that people wouldn't fall for this bullshit but I guess I sorely was mistaken.

Laitmer is a conservative, racist piece of shit who is going to take over Manchin's job of fucking things up for progressives. Fucking hell this sucks.

To top it off, Israel just successfully dropped a political nuke on a critic and will likely have everyone running scared in the future.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Machin is in a different chamber

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Way to focus on the important parts 🙄

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It matters though. The weight of a single Rep in the House is far less than a US Senator. It sucks, of course, but very relevant. He can't be a Manchin.

[-] theparadox@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

You can abuse your position as a holdout and potentially fuck everything up in either chamber. Bills require passage in both chambers... but I'm sure you knew that.

I just hope there are enough gains in the house to make his ass irrelevant.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Israel also failed with every other progressive so far. And this guy had a target on his back from the day he pulled the fire alarm to delay a vote.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

This guy had a target on his back because he's a progressive. The fire alarm thing was just a weak spot.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

That's my point. He gave them ammunition. He made himself a joke. You can't survive that without big party support.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

He created a vulnerability, yes. aipac exploited it.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I agree.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

To top it off, Israel just successfully dropped a political nuke on a critic and will likely have everyone running scared in the future.

And then in a decade or so when Israel does something equally heinous we'll have an entire new generation wondering why the US supports Israel.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

Democrats love foreign interference as long as it's against progressives.

[-] sxan@midwest.social 8 points 4 months ago

Anybody following this able to give a balanced summary? I find The Hill to tend right-leaning and don't much trust their analysis.

The Hill seems to be placing the defeat of Bowman on his stance against the genocide in Palestine, which is becoming a sort of dog-whistle saying, "stand against the invasion of Palestine, and this is what happens to you." It may in this case be true; I can believe it, but I don't trust The Hill to not be constructing a narrative.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 29 points 4 months ago

AIPAc spent like 14 million against him.

I think it I saw an article about how this was the most expensive primary for the House.

So yeah, because of his stance on Palestine (which was "genocide bad") Israel interfered in our election.

But Schumer, Harrison, and Biden take more AIPAC money that pretty much anyone else, so they're going to say this proves voters don't want progress and love genocide.or some other crazy shit.

Our system is broken and abused, and a D by someone's name clearly isn't enough anymore.

[-] worldwidewave@lemmy.world 24 points 4 months ago

This is all right, I’ll just add that Bowman was among the first to call for a ceasefire in Gaza, basically right after Oct 7th happened. A number of large progressive Dems have rallied to his side (including Bernie and AOC this past weekend), which clearly wasn’t enough.

This was also a D primary, so everyone had a D by their name.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

This was also a D primary, so everyone had a D by their name.

My point was Bowman's opponent took 14 million from a foreign government to support their genocide

He has a D by his name, but he's a piece of shit. If the party has standards he wouldn't be in the party

But the party doesn't have standards, because the party leaders take AIPAC money too.

Like, I thought it was pretty clear already, is it making sense yet?

[-] retrospectology@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yup, what's important for people to understand is that AIPAC is the single largest source of GOP money in Democratic primaries and campaigns.

They take money from right-wing billionaires and use it to back right-wing Democrats who they know can be relied upon to be obstructionist.

AIPAC funding needs to be banned within the party, same as they did with the NRA who tried to do the same thing.

[-] Tinidril@midwest.social 17 points 4 months ago

With Hillary weighing in on the side of AIPAC to endorse the challenger, I'd say that the establishment is pretty comfortable taking AIPAC's money.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

I REALLY wish she'd just shut up and enjoy her long overdue retirement already 😮‍💨

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Because the heads of the party are pocketing Israeli checks.

The D or R does not matter when it comes to Israel and its disgusting.

The only way to end it is to end lobbying.

[-] Tinidril@midwest.social 10 points 4 months ago

Not everyone was a D, at least not the voters. There was a massive push to reregister a lot of Republicans and Independents as Democrats.

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 4 months ago

Israel/aipac flooded his opponent with money because bowman was critical of Isreal.

Dems also changed their minds one actually supporting the incumbents here.

[-] Tinidril@midwest.social 16 points 4 months ago

Dems also changed their minds one actually supporting the incumbents here.

This has never been a standard they apply to progressives.

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 4 months ago

Amazing how that happens every time

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

Compare the party's treatment of Bowman to their treatment of Coathanger Cuellar.

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The Hill fired Katie Halper, a Jewish women, in the past for agreeing that israel is an apartheid state at a time human rights organisations did so.

The Hill just fired one of their most popular reporters Briahna Joy Gray for being too anti-israel and pushing back on debunked rape hoaxes.

The Hill is 100% a Zionist propaganda outlet.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world -4 points 4 months ago

The other shoe is this is the guy who pulled the fire alarm. The attack ads for his primary have been written for a long time and he didn't have good odds no matter who primaried him. The Dems went with the conservative guy to get AIPAC to fund the campaign and because they don't fundamentally care about ideology, just having the most seats.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

This is the guy who pulled a fire alarm to delay a vote. They were never not going to primary him. His statements on Israel just meant they could get AIPAC to fund his replacement.

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world -4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Stark reminder that the Democratic party is fully bought and paid for by AIPAC. Who's AIPACs primary funder again? That's right, Republicans.

A vote for Democrat is a vote for Republicans.

this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2024

73 points (96.2% liked)

politics

19097 readers

1138 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News