this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2024
117 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13912 readers
902 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ButtBidet@hexbear.net 46 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I need to scream over and over. The Cass Review is not peer reviewed. Scientifically, it's a blog paid for by NHS.

[–] TheDoctor@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s had several peer reviewed rebuttals that are damning, however.

[–] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Any chance you have some links handy? I just had an argument with my brother about this issue but didn't have any sources.

[–] windowlicker@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

this critique points out the numerous methodological flaws in the report.

[–] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

heart-sickle Thank you very much!

[–] MolotovHalfEmpty@hexbear.net 27 points 1 year ago

Michael Gove got pilloried by every shitlib media figure, Labour politician, and civil servant for saying "the public have had enough of experts".

Now all those same people may not say it out loud, but have adopted a much more deeply destructive and craven hatred for experts, actual science, or policy research and are enacting it regularly to kill the public.

These people deserve to be dragged before a court of the people they've harmed and loved ones of the people they've callously killed with this bullshit and be sentenced accordingly.

[–] RaisedFistJoker@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago

The tweet says it like Cass isnt popping a fucking bottle of champagne over the people she killed