201
submitted 3 days ago by schizoidman@lemmy.ml to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 days ago

This isn't competition, it sounds like the CCP heavily subsidises the manufacture, in an attempt to kill the American industry off.

Thinking in decades or centuries is a very powerful tool!

[-] SeattleRain@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

The US subsidizes their EV industry twice as much as China. The real why China can do this is because the US has gutted their industrial base in favor of financialization while China built up their industrial base.

[-] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 days ago

Yeah, sure - that's still China trying to undercut and ensure the US remains reliant on them long term...

[-] SeattleRain@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

No that's just the US not being competitive because stock buy backs and layoffs are easier than building good cheap cars.

[-] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 days ago

...or both. Think about it, if what you've said is completely true (I don't disagree, BTW), why would they bother subsidising?

They're trying to ring fence the market. That the US is helping then is only vaguely related

[-] SeattleRain@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

But it's not both. How can you produce something for cheaper with less subsidies unless your just better at it.

It's like saying the winner of a race had an unfair advantage even after giving their opponent a head start.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
201 points (92.8% liked)

News

21678 readers
3023 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS