424
submitted 4 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] orcrist@lemm.ee 88 points 4 months ago

What a terrible article. The solution is throwing more subsidies? Of course it's not! The solution is making it illegal to own more than a few properties. It really is that easy.

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee 27 points 4 months ago

Why is the for profit house building industry involved in solving the problem they had a hand in making?

Reform the CPA and just build ourselves. Or use the army core of engineers. They are getting paid either way.

[-] Moneo@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Non-profit / below market housing is crucial. Without it, the people who actually keep cities functioning and interesting, service workers, artists, etc get pushed out.

I have a career that enables me to pay a lot of money for housing but I don't want to live in a neighbourhood that only consists of people like me, cause I'm boring as fuck. I also don't want to be part of the reason those people get displaced.

More social housing now!

[-] P1nkman@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

Don't be stupid. How else an I going to make money by doing nothing? Get a job? That's for people who don't pull themselves up by their bootstraps!

[-] Moneo@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

I pulled myself up by my parents bootstraps.

[-] P1nkman@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

See, this guy's knows how to make money, unlike the rest of you pleps...

[-] LordCrom@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

Raise property taxes 500% for property that is not registered as the owners primary residence.

That should do it

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 7 points 4 months ago

The solution is to build more housing where people want to live.

Don't get suckered into their blame game. This just results in everybody pointing fingers while the prices continue to soar.

Prices only go up because there's competition to buy them.

[-] sunzu@kbin.run 5 points 4 months ago

Tax and other policies encourage the parasitic behavior.

[-] orcrist@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

I feel that you missed one basic aspect of economics. Competition is one reason prices might go up. There are other reasons, which are relevant here. Monopolies, collusion, price fixing, goods that people can't live without, speculation, those are also reasons that prices go up.

In the housing market, it's not fair, it's not free, this isn't a basic supply and demand situation.

[-] SeattleRain@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago
[-] orcrist@lemm.ee 26 points 4 months ago

I'm down with anything. The point is that your rent is not high because Bob has two houses. It's because the real estate speculators own five thousand.

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago

Bob should be paying 200% property tax on the 2nd house

[-] nomous@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Bob is not the enemy, Bob is a lucky retiree.

Berkshire Hathaway and their 500k rental properties, are the enemy.

[-] Moneo@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Both/neither of them are the enemy. The enemy is the system that allows anyone to profit off owning homes.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

To be fair, everyone doesnt want to own housing all rhe time (say you study somewhere for a year for example, you might want to rent. Or when you try out anew city) so some landlording is needed. We don't need landlords having lots of homes though.

[-] Moneo@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Landlording should never be done for profit. Socialize the fuck out of it. My water, electricity and healthcare is socialized, why do parasites profit off my home?

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Profit, profit, I'd say reasonable profit and mandatory standards.

For example, when I lived in sweden I knew a landlord, he was stopping because you beeded around 50 appartments (might be inflated from his side, but in many countries you can live off of 2 so ...) to make a decent salary.

In sweden you cant rent out a shitty appartment, you cant set the rent as you like it, and youre taxed etc. etc.

I mean it should be like a normal job, not granting you robber rights.

[-] Moneo@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

The solution is making it illegal to own more than a few properties

This problem does not have a single solution. Get rid of landlords and you're still left with a large group of people fighting over a limited supply. Better zoning laws, removal of parking minimums, better transit + micro-mobility infrastructure, and more below market not-for-profit housing.

It's not a simple problem, even if the motives that created the problem are.

[-] orcrist@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

I think we agree, with the caveat that you need to be careful when stating a position like yours, because it's often used as an excuse to do nothing at all.

load more comments (33 replies)
this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
424 points (98.0% liked)

News

23263 readers
3842 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS