651

Donald Trump was ridiculed Saturday after attending what his campaign called a Black roundtable at a Detroit church — with photos showing a largely white audience.

Trump’s campaign reached out to the 180 Church to set up the event at which attendees asked a handful of questions before bursting into a rendition of Happy Birthday.

The evangelical church is in the heart of Detroit’s west side and has a mainly Black congregation.

But photos caught by the media, and shared widely online, showed a lot of white people in the audience.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ZeroCool@vger.social 139 points 1 week ago

More images from reporters on various social media:

Image] Image
Image

[-] grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org 83 points 1 week ago

I thought it was disrespectful to wear your hat in church. Huh.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago

It's historically disrespectful for (men) to wear a hat indoors in quite a few buildings. That guy there looks like he'd be old enough to know better.

[-] grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 1 week ago

And iirc the historical reason it's not disrespectful for women to keep their hat on is that hats were much more integrated into women's hairdos. So, it'd be a whole production of removing hat pins, re-arranging curls, etc.

[-] JacksonLamb@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That's an interesting theory but there are many churches where women are supposed to put on a hat especially for church.

Probably it has more to do with this rather ridiculous passage from Corinthians:

Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonoureth his head.

5 But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven. 6 For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered.

7 For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man. Source 1 Corinthians 11: 2-16

@CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world

[-] Thetimefarm@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

Wait so is this saying hair counts as a hat?

[-] candybrie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

No. If you have hair, it needs to be covered. If you don't cover it, then you ought to shave it. But women shouldn't shave their heads. So they should wear hats. But if you don't have hair, you shouldn't wear a hat.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

That might be part of it and seems practical. I think another was that men taking off a helmet/lifting a visor was a thing - similar to (possible?) origins of the handshake - military men signifying they mean no harm.

Norms change over time - used to be, until JFK, there was even more rituals conformed to around men and hats until he came along. JFK was apparently blamed for men mostly abandoning the hat, but apparently that was building before he came along...in today's world, I don't know that it makes a whole lot of sense for something decorative like a hat to have all these rules only apply to one gender...might have been a time when someone got the vapors over a guy not removing his hat when he entered a library, church, etc...but I suppose that sort of thing is fading nearly daily. People don't always wear a suit and tie everywhere, either...

While it doesn't really exude "classy" vibes to have some guy sitting in a church wearing a hat, or, even worse, a hat with a slogan most Americans associate with a hate group, but if violating fading fashion norms was all these people were doing, I doubt too many would care.

[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago

Yeah hats went way down long before JFK like pre WWII

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago

"that guy"? The are dozens of them... This isn't a church service, it's clearly a cult service.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago
[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago
[-] Thetimefarm@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

Stop, I can only get so erect.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago
[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago

Thank you! Does your app show?

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Yes, the standard website.

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

That cropping. Seriously I thought there was a hair on my phone.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Oh definitely - even in that pic above there are several, but I was talking about the guy in the red shirt near the front in the pic above.

[-] ExFed@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago

From what I remember, it is

[-] andros_rex@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

It’s never been about Christianity. It’s really a new religion - the only parts of the Bible they know are the anti-queer parts.

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 3 points 1 week ago

As a Christian, it disgusts me how these people are pretending

load more comments (23 replies)
this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
651 points (98.2% liked)

politics

18059 readers
2874 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS