279
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by Fish@midwest.social to c/news@lemmy.world

Retail chains like TJX, the parent company of TJ Maxx and Marshalls, are equipping some store employees with body cameras to deter shoplifting and improve safety. This is part of a growing trend in the retail industry, as stores respond to an increase in organized retail theft and violence against workers. However, some criminologists and worker advocates argue that body cameras are unlikely to be an effective deterrent and that retailers should focus on improving training, staffing, and other safety measures instead. There are also concerns that the body camera footage could be misused, such as to monitor and discourage union organizing. Overall, the implementation of body cameras in retail is a complex issue with pros and cons that retailers will need to carefully consider.

Summarized by Kagi Universal Summarizer

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 78 points 5 months ago

You could spend a lot of money on body cameras, or you could reduce your prices to being affordable again. I'd say either one has a decent chance of dissuading shoplifters.

But I suppose you can only write off the former.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 42 points 5 months ago

It’s probably more due to the lack of staff than price of goods, something else they could’ve addressed with that camera money.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

honestly, body cameras are more about liability after the fact. There's really only two reasons to strap a camera on somebody- liability defense (cops, armed security guards, etc,) and being able to monitor what the fuck they're doing. both are important when the individuals in question are armed. Not so much when the expected response is constructive cowardice.

There's absolutely no way a body camera would act as a deterrent when traditional and AI-enhanced security cameras that they're absolutely already using won't. Also, I'm not entirely sure I believe that there's massive waves of organized shoplifters.

There is- as noted in the article- a massive wave of unionization, though. and that would probably hurt their profits far more than any wave of shoplifting ever will.

[-] Neato@ttrpg.network 8 points 5 months ago

I haven't been to TJ Max in forever. Aren't they a low cost clothing store?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

Nothing is low cost anymore.

[-] brown567@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago

I'm pretty sure you can write off shoplifted items as lost assets, so maybe just let them get shoplifted?

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

reduce your prices to being affordable again

Uh, they don't get much cheaper in the new clothing market. If you want even cheaper than the cheapest, learn to thrift and repair.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

And yet people can't afford new clothes.

[-] TAG@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I am pretty certain Marshalls (a TJX store) has kept prices fairly flat (if not dropping them slightly). I am used to paying about $30 for pants (across many discount retailers), but the last couple of pairs I bought there were around $20.

this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2024
279 points (98.3% liked)

News

23301 readers
1187 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS