this post was submitted on 25 May 2024
585 points (91.7% liked)

Science Memes

20656 readers
2197 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Meta Post Tags



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


If you are here asking: "Is this a science meme?"

Probably, yes. We use the Dawkins definition of meme: a replicating idea, not just an image macro with a fact on it. A good post here doesn't need to teach you something. It needs to make you ask something: who, what, where, when, and especially why or how.

Science isn't a filing cabinet of facts, it's a conversation. For example, a photo of an eel or other localized wildlife counts because most people never see one, and wonder is the first step of inquiry. A car meme counts if it makes you curious about what's under the bonnet. If you want to talk about something you noticed in the world, chances are someone else wants to talk about it too.

We moderate for vibe, not category. Pruning is light, especially where a post creates interesting discussion. Experimenting is encouraged.

See the pinned paper on Shitposting as Public Pedagogy if you want the academic case for why this works.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 35 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

I mean... Science does sometimes lie. Plenty of research papers out there with fudged results or questionable methodology. Also the fact that scientists don't always agree with each other on things.

You should always question authority. Just don't question the truth once it's actually been proven.

[–] Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Science does sometimes lie.

Hm, imo, science doesn't lie — scientists lie. It need not even be a lie — it could simply be a misinterpretation of data. As long as proper science was done, and documented, reproduction of the experiment will get to the bottom of its accuracy.

[–] match@pawb.social 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Question the proven truth all the time,cas long as you're not fighting against observations and evidence

[–] ursakhiin@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago

as long as you're not fighting against observations and evidence without additional observations and evidence.

Observations and evidence could be non-maliciously incorrect. New observations could be made that invalidate the old after another change in our perception occurs.

Observations and evidence just show to the best of our abilities at the moment.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago

I completely agree, heck there's also times when all the science is done perfectly but the result is incorrect because the people interpreting the data got Cause and Effect backwards... Or worse, when the data checks out, but violates the current paradigm so much that the academia of the time rejects it out of principle alone and refuses to acknowledge you. (This literally happened when we discovered germs, and the first person to pitch the idea of the Big Bang was mocked over how "religious" the idea sounded, so yes, there's precedent for this shit.)

[–] thejoker954@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

But at what level of "proven" is it actually "proven"? That's where a disconnect lays.