190
Trying to shame a group of people for simply existing is actually just vile and resentful hate and not a part of "civil debate"? Who woulda thunk it?
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
190 points (99.5% liked)
chapotraphouse
13445 readers
816 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank
Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here
Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
From what I remember of the later books, it seems like her primary problem with the Dursleys just became that they were fat.
Sean (the skull) has an unnecessarily long video where he goes through everything that sucks about Harry Potter basically
And yes, after listening to his extended list of examples it's hard to conclude otherwise.
There's a lot of stuff in those books that flew under the radar 20+years ago when I was reading them
Ugh, I guess that explains why Draco Malfoy was redeemed at the last minute. He was essentially one of the Dursleys, but it was okay because he was written to be conventionally attractive.
Sort of off-topic, but all of this reminds me of the time the UK media raised a stink about rightoids being called "gammons".
sitting down to an exciting game of backremoved