43
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Doubledee@hexbear.net 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Is Q supposed to be meaningfully older than Mark? I know the synoptics all are believed to be taking from it, but I don't remember ever being told how distant of a predecessor it was imagined to be.

[-] JamesConeZone@hexbear.net 2 points 4 months ago

I think it's argued to be a sayings text like the Gospel of Thomas compiled in the 40s/50s. I've actually leaned towards scholarship by Mark Goodacre and others who argued against the existence of Q. His books and blogs have more on that, but he's pretty convincing.

this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
43 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13445 readers
843 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS