256
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/globalnews@lemmy.zip

Australia's Mona asked a court to reverse its ruling that allowed men inside a women's only space.

Archived version: https://archive.ph/oHT6U

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de 34 points 6 months ago

The amount of people/men who don't get it is astonishing. Art isn't just something you can put on a wall. This entire thing with excluding men is an art installation, supposed to generate emotions and a discussion about exclusion and gender disparity. And seeing how many men around the world are frothing at the mouth over an installation at a small museum at the end of the world it is an extremely powerful piece of art. I applaud the museum for this.

[-] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 23 points 6 months ago

There are still places that are men only. Women can't join the freemasons for example, but you don't see this sort of extremely angry reaction to that.

And I agree, this art piece is doing exactly what it was supposed to.

[-] vonbaronhans@midwest.social 14 points 6 months ago

Huh. Let women into the Freemasons, I guess?

[-] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago

That'd be ideal, but I don't really see that happening tbh. There's a women's version of the freemasons, but it's not nearly as popular or active as far as I can tell.

[-] HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Do you have any more examples other than the freemasons? I had assumed we were done with needless segregation (excluding bathrooms and such).

The only thing that makes sense in my mind is that male dominated spaces have non-explicit social barriers in place that are being approximated by the explicit barrier the museum has set up.

In the UK there's golf clubs that have pretty toxic atmospheres and dress codes but aren't legally allowed to bar women.

Sorry if this is super ignorant, I'm acknowledging the problem I just want to understand it better

[-] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 6 points 6 months ago

I'm from the US, but here it's mostly fraternal lodges that still ban women, and certain religious groups(which I don't think those technically count due to separation of church and state). But the Order of Oddfellows, Fraternal Order of Eagles, Freemasons, and the Botherhood of St Andrew don't initiate women. Im sure theres more but i dont know about them.
Granted those have some religious influence, but aren't churches directly as far as I understand. Also the skull and bones, but they're very secretive and that could have changed and no one would be the wiser.

I'm not sure about other countries laws, but in the US private institutions are more or less allowed to segregate by gender, but often there's backlash and they lose money so most won't go there. That's why it's mostly these secretive fraternal orders that still do it.

[-] HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Thank you! I wasn't expecting such a long and well written response 😁

[-] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

Np! Always happy to have a civil discussion! and thank you for asking your question in good faith

[-] fiat_lux@kbin.social 17 points 6 months ago

small museum at the end of the world

The end of the world is a fair description, but small is not. It is the largest privately funded museum in the Southern Hemisphere and has 6000m² (64583 ft²) of gallery space.

[-] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

You're right, but to play devil's advocate; that's extremely unintuitive and took me to my 20s to figure out

Well, the mean age here seems to be over 30, so I'd expect a tad more maturity.

[-] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org -2 points 6 months ago

"Maturity", defined as being willing to accept explicit sex discrimination, so long as said discrimination penalizes men (as men are an acceptable target for discrimination)?

If that's still the hill you wanna die on, please.

[-] Larry@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

"I was an asshole as a work of art, not because I am an asshole"

[-] quindraco@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

You're applauding a troll for trolling successfully?

[-] LwL@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

I appreciate some good trolling that doesn't actually harm anyone. And in this case it also certainly generated discussion, so I'd say it's more than trolling anyway.

Intent matters. If all you just want is to piss off people, that's trolling. I don't see this being the point here.

[-] quindraco@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

That is the artist's explicitly intended point.

No, it is really not. There's an intent behind the outrage.

[-] quindraco@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago

“The men are experiencing Ladies Lounge, their experience of rejection is the artwork,” she said.

The purpose is for men to suffer and be upset. That's what this of art is, really - human suffering for its own sake. It's quintessential trolling, which the artist has been quite open about.

[-] over_clox@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago

Yeah, well my late father was a painter, and his number one rule was that he didn't paint stuff to be hidden away. One of his last wishes was to make sure people see his artworks.

It's up to the people that view his works as to their thoughts and opinions.

this post was submitted on 07 May 2024
256 points (94.4% liked)

Interesting Global News

2611 readers
221 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS