313
submitted 6 months ago by gedaliyah@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

It’s clear that companies are currently unable to make chatbots like ChatGPT comply with EU law, when processing data about individuals. If a system cannot produce accurate and transparent results, it cannot be used to generate data about individuals. The technology has to follow the legal requirements, not the other way around.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 64 points 6 months ago

This is the problem with training LLMs on Reddit. It doesn’t know how to say “I don’t know”. So, like Redditors…. It just makes shit up.

[-] ech@lemm.ee 47 points 6 months ago

It's not that it doesn't know how to say "I don't know". It simply doesn't know. Period. LLMs are not sentient and they don't think about the questions they are asked, let alone if the answer they provide is correct. They string words together. That's all. That we've gotten those strings of words to strongly resemble coherent text is very impressive, but it doesn't make the program intelligent in the slightest.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

What amazes me is that people don't find it significant that they don't ask questions. I would argue there is no such thing as intelligence without curiosity.

[-] reev@sh.itjust.works -2 points 6 months ago

What do you even mean with that? Pi asks questions and certainly feels curious and engaged in conversation. Even chatgpt will ask for more information if it doesn't find the requested information in, for example, an Excel spreadsheet you upload.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 22 points 6 months ago

They're trained on far more than reddit. But it's not a training data problem, it's a wrong tool problem. It's called "generative AI" for a reason: it generates text, same way a Markov chain does. You want it to tell you something, it'll tell you. You want factual data, don't ask a storyteller.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

What I think is especially funny though is that both the other person and myself have done enough (not horrific) things in our lives to have things like mainstream media mentions but it still got it entirely wrong.

I'm not famous but it definitely should have known who I am.

[-] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 months ago

How can a Flying Squid not be famous? Haven't the tonight show contacted you about doing aerobatics?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago
[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

I thought I knew you from somewhere. That was gonna bother me all day.

[-] Eranziel@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

If an LLM had to say "I don't know" when it doesn't know, that's all it would be allowed to say! They literally don't know anything. They don't even know what knowing means. They are complex (and impressive, admittedly) text generators.

[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

But we know everything, why would we say otherwise when we are always the smartest person in every room we've ever walked into? What even is this foreign tongue 'I don't know'. I've never heard of it before. Is it latin?

this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
313 points (97.3% liked)

News

23310 readers
3617 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS