509
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world 70 points 5 months ago

You know, this post made me realize something. Some people are viewing it in terms of "rank", instead of an arbitrary scientific classification designed to efficiently communicate ideas in a clear and concise way.

It's like ... mythology or something, and the planet(oid) being anthropomorphized.

Do people also view kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, species as "ranks" of some sort, with some intrinsically greater value being given to some over others?

[-] Squorlple@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

It’s like … mythology or something, and the planet(oid) being anthropomorphized.

I mean, the planet(oid)s are named after gods.

The personification of its classification is probably related to the exclusivity of the title and “bigger is better” mentality. Since every life form has a taxonomy for domain to species, there’s not really an exclusivity to each echelon. I don’t imagine anybody really thinks like this meme below, for example:

[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

This makes me want to devise a tiered, inclusive classification scheme for space objects.

We could start with orbital objects, any object that normally experiences regular, periodic orbits with minimal deviation. So, everything in the galaxy would be one except potentially Sag A, and the galaxy itself. Perhaps the next branching subsets could be things undergoing continuous fusion somewhere in their body or not?

[-] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 9 points 5 months ago

Do people also view kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, species as "ranks" of some sort, with some intrinsically greater value being given to some over others?

Well, for humans we most certainly do

[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

So, "homo" is better than "sapiens"? And "animal" is better than homo sapiens?

Or do I have it backwards, and "lower" ranks are better? So, "pinus ponderosa" would be better than "plant"?

[-] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 months ago

I was just alluding to our racism 👀

[-] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 5 months ago

Our racism is completely unrelated to our classification. We are racist between homo sapiens and homo sapiens

[-] shneancy@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

I think it'll matter a bit more once (if) we get to explore our solar system for real. I feel like right now the concept of "planet" is still rather distant in our minds and a lot of people just base it on vibes

[-] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Thing is everyone has one of those.

Compare it to non-sentience, sentience, and sapience, to properly anthropomorphize it.

[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Every celestial body fits into a specific classification too.

[-] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Yeah but no one just has a kingdom or phylum.

Every living creature gets an entry from domain to species.

Celestial bodies aren't a hierarchy, a planet isn't also a dwarf planet or an asteroid.

[-] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Hard not to anthropomorphize things when they’re named after our gods

[-] warmaster@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Planet Y

In case it's a dwarf

[-] Squorlple@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago
this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
509 points (96.4% liked)

Science Memes

10531 readers
2036 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS