142
Like why tho? (hexbear.net)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NuraShiny@hexbear.net 64 points 3 months ago

I think rescue efforts should be strictly allotted their resources by how funny and dramatically appropriate it would be if the people in question died. So in the case of the bridge, making an effort would be fine, but they should NEVER have tried finding that submarine and should have in fact shot the people on it if it had returned safely.

[-] SuperNovaCouchGuy2@hexbear.net 44 points 3 months ago

they should NEVER have tried finding that submarine and should have in fact shot the people on it if it had returned safely.

miyazaki-laugh

[-] D61@hexbear.net 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

20 years from now some sailor will tell a wild story of actually finding the sub's wreckage and survivors after the news, the authorities, and their families all officially accepted their deaths.

After quietly contacting the families, the sailor recalls the crew being offered an obscene amount of money to make sure that the knowledge that there were survivors is never made public.

When asked why anybody should believe him, what proof does he have, he points to the couch were the interviewer is sitting and says, "Thats one of the pillows we used to smother them."

this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
142 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13297 readers
968 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS