318
submitted 7 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A Nebraska woman allegedly found a lucrative quirk at a gas station pump — double-swipe the rewards card and get free gas!

Unfortunately for her, you can’t do that, prosecutors said. The 45-year-old woman was arrested March 6 and faces felony theft charges accusing her of a crime that cost the gas station nearly $28,000.

Prosecutors say the woman exploited the system over a period of several months. Police learned of the problem in October when the loss-prevention manager at Bosselman Enterprises reported that the company’s Pump & Pantry in Lincoln had been scammed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 months ago

Most gas cards are designed to give out small rewards, this particular gas card was designed to give out bigger rewards.

If an ice cream scooper mistakenly gives one person a larger scoop than anyone else, I don't blame the person with more ice cream, that's obviously the responsibility of the ice cream scooper.

Designing a rewards card that functions correctly and a car crashing because presumably something has gone wrong are very different situations.

A deer didn't kick the fuel pump, wires weren't damaged in the register; everything worked as it was designed to, including the double swipe resulting in free gas.

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world -2 points 7 months ago

That's not how the rewards work though.

There's basically an account to which you accumulate your entire spendings, and based off that, you'll get a a few % off at most, in form of either a flat out discount or perhaps in some other form.

"Designing IT systems that function perfectly" is what you meant to say with "designing a rewards card that functions correctly". Do you have any idea of how many technologies and codes and databases are interacting with such a "simple" thing as showing your rewards card to a reader? I'm guessing not.

"Everything worked as it was designed to"

So you think someone designed a system to give out free gas? What a great business model. Perfect design, isn't it?

[-] Theharpyeagle@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Sorry, but if they didn't test their hardware against swiping twice, that's 100% on them. Obviously you can't catch every bug but that doesn't make it not your fault when something slips through. A responsible company doesn't blame the user, it fixes the problem and then figures out how to improve development and QA practices so it doesn't happen again.

It's not the user's job to QA your product. If the product allows them to do something without tampering with it, that might as well be its design.

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world -4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Yeah because updates to software never happen.

What are you, 5?

might as well be

But it isn't. And intent is a very big part in law.

Learn some law.

[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago

You've made many incorrect assumptions.

"'Designing IT systems that function perfectly' is what you meant to say"

No, that is not what I meant to say

"Do you have any idea of how many technologies and codes and databases are interacting with such a "simple" thing as showing your rewards card to a reader? I'm guessing not."

Guess all you want; yes, I do.

"So you think someone designed a system to give out free gas?"

Obviously.

"What a great business model."

No, it's a terrible business model because you receive no compensation for the resources you're selling.

That company should refine their design.

this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
318 points (98.2% liked)

News

23263 readers
3863 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS