84
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

Big strong predator that sucks at hunting so much that they need to lure the deer to stand directly in front of their gun.

At that point you're not even a hunter, you're a slob that might as well be ordering from a menu. Pathetic.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SerLava@hexbear.net 16 points 8 months ago

The ecologist would generally prefer to introduce wolves or, if they weren't allowed to, they would shoot the deer. In fact those are the 2 main things they are doing and encouraging in various out of wack, deer overpopulated ecosystems.

[-] crispy_lol@hexbear.net 2 points 8 months ago

Funny, are you an ecologist? First article I found in google scholar concluded hunters should be reduced.

[-] SerLava@hexbear.net 2 points 8 months ago

They should be reduced in various areas or replaced in all areas by natural predators. I assure you there are areas with not enough hunting because a) the bears and wolves were exterminated 100 years ago, b) livestock farmers lobby the local and state governments against introducing those predators and c) hunters either don't hunt enough or only try to trophy hunt

[-] crispy_lol@hexbear.net 1 points 8 months ago

I think the people who think hunting is the only options should be reduced in various areas

[-] SerLava@hexbear.net 1 points 8 months ago

I mean yeah, natural predators are much more effective

this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2024
84 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13546 readers
792 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS