37
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

Vanity Fair. Follow-up from this morning's post: The Story Behind the New York Times October 7 Exposé from The Intercept

The sharks smell blood in the water.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] buttwater@hexbear.net 16 points 7 months ago

Am I reading this right...

NYT posts sensational/false weaponized sexual violence article sometime between October-December.

NYT is going to post a follow-up article, but faces crisis of either repeating false claims or downplaying how much sexual violence occurred, essentially admitting they lied earlier. This internal debate gets leaked to The Intercept

NYT conducts "witch hunt" interviews of staff to find who leaked to The Intercept.

That's how I read it. What I want to know, that this article didn't cover, is: where did the original bad reporting come from and why did it get published?

[-] davel@hexbear.net 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The Intercept: “Between the Hammer and the Anvil” The Story Behind the New York Times October 7 Exposé

this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
37 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13484 readers
942 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS