1422
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] freebee@sh.itjust.works 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It is real. People have gotten mad at me for saying the 1 general (in my opinion in that case not-gendered) word instead of the slight pause and adding *innen. It's quite difficult for non-native speakers to get used to it.

Meanwhile, in Dutch language, many female doctors, bosses, directors etc all prefer to be spoken to with the general "male" word, because they prefer to be spoken to on an equal term as their male colleagues and for the difference not to be made. Witnessing Germanic languages growing apart a tad further I guess.

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 7 points 8 months ago

In English we have a few gendered professions (waiter/waitress, actor/actress) and I feel like most people.lean towards the "male" term as the general term as well. In general it's fine to call anyone an actor or a waiter but it would be weird to call a male actor an actress.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

Actress seems to have fallen out of fashion, at least in personal experience.

Ngram only somewhat confirms:

[-] Teon@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago

Have you watched Drag Race? Many actresses on this show.

[-] freebee@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

"actrice" is one the few in dutch where it does still seem to matter to use the female version! Calling a female actress the male "acteur" would weird out a room i think. But if it's a group of both male and female people, and you use the general "acteurs" it would be fine i think and "actrices en acteurs" would be fine too. While in german, only the "schauspielerinnen und schauspieler" of "schauspieler*innen" would be okay and just saying "schauspieler" to a mixed group would be very frowned upon.

I get the idea, i hate the implementation. I think it would be easier for everyone to just cancel one word and call everyone the same, instead of doubling down on everything, it's doable in writing, but it's a real hassle in talking.

[-] menemen@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

It is also quite difficult for native speakers. I have nothing against the general idea, but the ":" solution is just shit. Destroys the whole flow of the language. Takes me out of a conversation/speech/whatever every time somebody uses it.

[-] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 months ago

Language is a tool and is shaped and molded to be used by its bearers. You'll get used to it and it'll come natural to you. If it's important to you, you'll get there.

Btw: the slight pause you insert between the main noun and the gendered suffix is called a glottal stop. You do it without thinking about it for a bunch of words already. Consider "Spiegelei". Notice the pause between "Spiegel" and "Ei"? Apply this same principle whenever you want to gender appropriately and you're golden.

[-] menemen@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

No one says Spiegel...Ei. if I say Kund:innen like that everyone will just hear Kundinnen.

And I also don't think people will get used to it. When something new gets introduced into a language, the first natural thing is to adjust it to the speaking pattern. Which is not possible here as it is an explicit and intentional break of the speaking pattern. It will stay alien as it pretty much intents to stay alien.

Maybe children that are just learning to speak atm will, but current adults? Only those who want to really really convince themselves for ideological reasons.

[-] Miphera@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

As a German, I'm pretty sure they're right. Look into glottal stop, it's not really a long pause or anything. Think of the difference of the connection of "Spiegel" and "ei" in Spiegelei, and "Schreiner" and "ei" in Schreinerei. It's this short contraction that stops airflow and then releases it again, and it's present at the beginning of the "ei" in Spiegelei, but not in Schreinerei.

Here's also the IPA pronunciations from Wiktionary:

Spiegelei: [ˈʃpiːɡl̩ˌʔaɪ̯]

Schreinerei: [ʃʁaɪ̯nəˈʁaɪ̯]

ʔ is the symbol for the glottal stop: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glottal_stop

[-] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 months ago
[-] menemen@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

As a native speaker I am 100% sure they are wrong. Or 100% of the people using that are doing it are doing it wrong.

[-] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 months ago

As I said, it's barely noticeable but you do make a stop in between. You're just used to using the word in your daily vocabulary that you don't notice it. And as mentioned before, if you care enough, you'll do it - if you don't, you won't. A little close-minded if you ask me but that's just my two cents. :)

[-] menemen@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yeah, and as I said the whole point of the ":" is to make a explipcitly noticable stop. Thus breaking the flow of the language. Otherwise it will just sund like the female version. This is not comparable.

[-] tobbue@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 8 months ago

Sorry to hear that. For me it's the other way round. While I nearly always use the generic masculine form when speaking directly to others that never happened to me. Then again at work it's forbidden for me to gender in official postings since I did that once.

What I totally get is that online it's a totally different experience and no matter whether you gender or don't you may as well drop yourself into a vet of acid.

[-] freebee@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

it was in real life and the person calling me out was a hardcore feminist. So yeah, the construction is being used to call out non-native speakers on their so-called ideological bias against feminists, or so it felt :s It weirded me out and continues to do so. To me it feels more inclusive to call everyone, male, female or non-binary, by one and the same word, instead of focussing on ones reproductive organs while talking about their profession or hobby or whatever.

[-] neutron@thelemmy.club 1 points 8 months ago

Same in Spanish. We can say programadores (male gender plural form) to refer to a group of programmers, regardless of gender, as the standard says. However, in recent years it's become common to say programadores y programadoras (male plural and female plural) or programadoras y programadores (female plural and male plural). Using only the male gender causes many people to complain, or so I've heard.

[-] bier@feddit.nl 1 points 8 months ago

Is "dokter" even a male word? What's the female version "dokterin","dokteres"?

[-] cows_are_underrated@feddit.de 2 points 8 months ago

The female version is Doktorin.

[-] bier@feddit.nl 1 points 8 months ago

I'm dutch and didn't even know this was a thing, is it something that is common in Belgium?

[-] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Dokteres enkel in dialect hier, maar in lokaal dialect maken we de lidwoorden ook mannelijk/vrouwelijk.

Groot verschil tussen "de die" (vrouwelijk) en "den die" (mannelijk) om iemand aan te wijzen bijvoorbeeld.

[-] freebee@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago
[-] bier@feddit.nl 1 points 8 months ago

Bedankt ik kende de term niet, maar blijkbaar ben ik (in Nederland) in de meerderheid

In onderzoek van het Centrum voor Leesonderzoek uit 2013 werd "dokteres" herkend door: 42 % van de Nederlanders; 85 % van de Vlamingen.[1]

this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2024
1422 points (97.3% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26666 readers
3339 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS