112
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Carguacountii@hexbear.net 2 points 7 months ago

Well, as you accept, its controversial - ambiguously understood. Maybe those people are idiots, it doesn't change the issue - there are idiots (or naive or poorly educated people) in this world, they have to be accomodated in terms of whats allowed in the public sphere.

You absolutely can be held responsible for writing such things, even if you put a disclaimer on it. Some people glorify or identify with monsters, even if they're presented as such - some people like villains in movies. The ambiguity is an issue easily avoided by banning the book - nothing of value would be lost.

[-] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 4 points 7 months ago

they have to be accomodated in terms of whats allowed in the public sphere.

THEY ABSOLUTELY DO NOT HAVE TO BE ACCOMMODATED SHUT THE FUCK UP

this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
112 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13469 readers
875 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS