696
#science (mander.xyz)
submitted 9 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
25 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ivanafterall@kbin.social 73 points 9 months ago

Random online scientist here to tell you: this study has deep flaws. Among them, the way it was conducted and its outcomes. This is for various technical reasons you wouldn't really understand.

[-] fossilesque@mander.xyz 31 points 9 months ago

You must be tenured.

[-] MBM@lemmings.world 3 points 9 months ago

As a random commenter, clearly the sample size is too small and they mixed up correlation and causation

[-] Blueoaky@mander.xyz 1 points 9 months ago

The contribution to the community is weak. I recommend the authors to work on their study design and to basically redo everything in good.

this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2024
696 points (95.8% liked)

Science Memes

10853 readers
3153 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Sal@mander.xyz
fossilesque@mander.xyz
SciBot@mander.xyz