113
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024
113 points (100.0% liked)
the_dunk_tank
15866 readers
434 users here now
It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Critical support to her grifting right-wing men tho, get that bread. You could work the Baphomet tattoo as part of your like finding god and becoming trad or w/e
Go fund me for getting my baphomet tattoo removed plz donate
but she's doing it to support a genocide country
Why is it that it seems like many leftists can conform to CHUDs own snooty standards better than the CHUDs themselves? Andrew Tate is a literal gigolo, there's the whole stereotype of nazis being rednecks in the US and then there's chav culture in the UK. Sure, there's bourgeoisie dumbasses like this, but I'm surprised at how many CHUDs fail their own high standards, yet not seem to care.
It's a power dynamic meant to be used against "others" not the in-group.