this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
94 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

14085 readers
1047 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net
MiraculousMM@hexbear.net
corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net
PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net
a_little_red_rat@hexbear.net
khizuo@hexbear.net
gaystyleJoker@hexbear.net
thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net
context@hexbear.net
Infamousblt@hexbear.net
Sulvy@hexbear.net
94
Calling for a ceasefire in Israel/Palestine is a liberal position. The radical position is to call for supporting the Palestinian resistance until there is an end to Israeli apartheid. (hexbear.net)
submitted 2 years ago by HexbearGPT@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
35 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Fuck a ceasefire, END APARTHEID!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] usernamesaredifficul@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Even the Japanese in WW2 were convinced to stop in the face of overwhelming violence when, before, they had elements in power saying they'd rather be exterminated than give up.

I heard they actually were just insisting the soviets be at the treaty negotiations so they didn't have to negotiate two peaces

[โ€“] WhatDoYouMeanPodcast@hexbear.net 3 points 2 years ago

I'm ready to believe that. A source would still be nice.

I would also put forward that overwhelming force, even without an atomic bomb, was enough to convince people who beforehand would have preferred that the island be exterminated.