168
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Fishroot@hexbear.net 44 points 10 months ago
[-] tripartitegraph@hexbear.net 34 points 10 months ago

Whenever you see things like this, or just how many pages Stalin read in a day, I'm just blown away. I'm such a lazy motherfucker, goddamn

[-] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 32 points 10 months ago

don't be too hard on yourself - a) he probably didn't read all of these and it is some intern's job to make this list b) reading for fun and reading for information are too different skills. You can buy a book on philosophy, skim 50% of it and deep dive into a single chapter.

[-] buttwater@hexbear.net 25 points 10 months ago

you've definitely read way more posts tho

[-] Fishroot@hexbear.net 4 points 10 months ago

Various people who knew Andropov well, including Vladimir Medvedev, Aleksandr Chuchyalin, Vladimir Kryuchkov[92] and Roy Medvedev, remembered him for his politeness, calmness, unselfishness, patience, intelligence and exceptionally sharp memory.[93] According to Chuchyalin, while working at the Kremlin, Andropov would read about 600 pages a day and remember everything he read.[94] Andropov read English literature and could communicate in Finnish, English and German.[95]

[-] usernamesaredifficul@hexbear.net 14 points 10 months ago

damn I'm not even sure the leader of my country has ever read a book

[-] Judge_Juche@hexbear.net 8 points 10 months ago

On the one hand it's very lib to be reading Piketty; but on the other Ninety-Three is Hugo's best and most revolutionary novel and dosen't get a lot of attention becuase of it. So I guess it's a wash.

[-] Fishroot@hexbear.net 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Piketty is a one trick pony, I went to one of his conference at my University. All he advocates for is a global progressive tax system. He never explains how it is going to be implemented (he himself acknowledges that there is a need for all government to form a UN like IRS which he doesn't believe it's ever going to be possible) or the fact that the implementation of his global tax system would just nuke most of the economy of countries that are just taxe havens for the rich.

The Netflix documentary of the book is enough to explain its contents. It's funny to see him talk about capitalism without mentioning ONCE Marx, Webber, Ricardo, etc. Or why the USA did the New Deal (because they never mention the Bolsheviks Revolution at all). The only mention of the USSR is that ''wow it collapsed because it's a failure and a police state, oh wow suddenly wealth inequality skyrocketed for no reasons''

Oh yeah, China is basically doing State Capitalism not so different than USA Post WW1 (never going into the details ofc), but they are bad because there are wealth inequality

this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
168 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13484 readers
942 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS