319
submitted 7 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

... is normal.

Look inside any manufacturing facility. All the pieces of equipment are depreciating assets, often purchased after issuing debt.

Not really the same thing. The manufacturing equipment generates revenue greater than its financing costs

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

If you use a car to commute to work, then the return on a car far exceeds the financing costs.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

Yeah except that equipment will last over half a century or more. I have worked on metal presses that were almost 19th century and know people who have worked on ones from the days of wood computers of the 1870s. Heck the OEM I work for was originally running everything off belts. One motor moving energy around with belts in the floor and ceiling.

You can't compare the two intelligently. Especially since safety standards keep rising and there isn't practical methods to make those old vehicles safe. Metal presses for example, gates and light curtains. No big deal. Try taking some car from the 1950s and adding airbags and a crumble zone. I imagine it is remotely possible to do it but not widespread.

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Useful life depends on the type of equipment. I'm sure there are some metal presses that last a hundred years, but there is plenty more equipment that has a useful life measured in years, especially high-tech equipment.

The iPhone is only 15 years old, how much of the equipment used to build the original model do you think is still in use?

Same is true of non-manufacturing sectors. For example, a hospital might issue bonds in order to build a new clinic or hospital wing. Much of the hospital equipment bought with those bonds will be replaced within ten years.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

Well yeah it depends, I always tell my clients that the moment we have to add a touchscreen they have to prepare to have a problem within 5 years. Which is why I push them to consider the extra warranty if they go that route. Most do some don't.

It's still not a great comparison. Individuals aren't too big to fail.

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The point is that depreciation is not the most important consideration when considering whether to finance something.

The most important consideration is the return on investment. If the equipment will allow you to make more money than you pay in financing plus depreciation, then you should buy it today even if it requires financing. You're not buying it because you expect it to appreciate.

And if you use a car to get to work, then the return on investment is your entire income. So if you need to finance a car to get to work, then finance it.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago

Right but people don't work the way businesses do. If everyone bought a car only when they needed a car to get to work and back the world would be much much different.

So many people at my work make a third of what I make and I see their giant pickups. Me? I drive a small economy car.

this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
319 points (94.9% liked)

News

21746 readers
1682 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS