this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
374 points (94.1% liked)

News

35692 readers
2802 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Legal analysts say Trump admitted that the intent in financial representations he made was to convince lenders to loan him money.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FARTYSHARTBLAST@kbin.social 20 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Hope they got paid up front...

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Narrator: “they didn’t.”

(Which really goes to show how incompetent they are.)

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Only people Trump ever paid on time, or at all, was businesses connected to the Russian Mob.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

exactly. which is why competent lawyers are staying away. Even moderately incompetent ones would demand payment upfront.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Only lawyers willing to take up trumps case, are people who think the fame of being associated with him will benefit them in the future.

Which says all you need to know about their intellectual capacity.

[–] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

It’s reached a point where now I’m instantly skeptical of any lawyer who starts going on the news circuit while a case is on-going - they’re looking for fame, not to talk about the case.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

They’ll capitalize on their 15 minutes of MAGA fame and write a book or run for office or whatever.

[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Nah, they got paid in "exposure" (to ridicule, sanctions, and indictments!)

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

exposure doesn't pay the bills.

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

On only fans it does

[–] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

People keep saying this but honesty if you dont have anything going for you... Why not do it for free?

I know bugger all about law but surely everyone will know you in the profession, and if you mange to do anything close to a good job, then you get some kind of credibility from it?

Seems like a yolo opportunity for anyone wanting to make a name for themselves.

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago

Ahh the good old “exposure “ argument.

It’s refreshing seeing it applied to lawyers instead of artists.

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

At this level there is much more to lose than gain. Trump can literally threaten your law license. The exposure isn’t worth the risk.

[–] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 1 points 2 years ago

your client can do this?