this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2026
316 points (97.0% liked)

memes

22228 readers
3660 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chris@l.roofo.cc 10 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

What? No! Driving faster is not safer. What kind of logic is that? If someone does something dangerous because I drive the speed limit they are unsafe not me.

[–] A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl 7 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Murrican logic.

Buing a bigger car is also safer according to them, even if then it turns 99% blindspot.

[–] MonkRome@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Certainly it is safer if everyone everyone drives the speed limit, lowering the speed of traffic. But that's not realistically what happens. I'm talking about when you are around other cars that are all going over the limit. The difference in speed between vehicles is also dangerous. When you drive slower than traffic you become a hazard and bottleneck that raises the danger of everyone near you. Better to be alive than "right".

The title is clickbait, its really about difference in speed: https://seasia.co/2025/09/05/driving-slower-is-actually-more-dangerous-than-driving-fast

Challenge your assumptions.

[–] chris@l.roofo.cc 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

So the article says the problem are people that won't follow the rules. People who overtake and go way too fast. I will not enable their behavior.

[–] MonkRome@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Nowhere in the article does it say that. Your ego is more important than your own life or the life of others, that tracks with both of your comments.

the core insight remains widely accepted in traffic engineering: deviation from the average traffic speed, especially on high-speed roads, is a significant risk factor.

[–] chris@l.roofo.cc 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It doesn't say that. You are right. What it says is that the dangers come from people overtaking and assuming that someone is faster. It has nothing to do with ego and only with adhering to the law. I don't want a speeding ticket because someone else what's to be faster.

Everyone who overtakes me when I am at the speed limit is an idiot in my eye. People could just follow the law. Then the average speed would be the legal speed limit.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Would you rather be lawful, or improve everyone's chances of surviving the trip?

[–] chris@l.roofo.cc 1 points 2 hours ago

Lawful. They made it dangerous, not me. What I want is everyone to be lawful. I don't want to break the law for the faults of other people. I will not pay for other people's disregard for the rules. I will avoid crashes in what ever way is left for me.

[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip -1 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I remember reading a story a while back. Couple lumberjacks had a serious accident, so while one guy was bleeding out in the back seat, the driver was doing 100+ and the third guy was on the phone with the cops trying to get a police escort.

They ran into a Karen like you, who decided to make sure they went the speed limit. Guy in the back seat died as a result.

[–] chris@l.roofo.cc 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

The fuck you talking about? I never said I'd actively block anyone from overtaking me and the traffic won't flow at 100mph. So what the fuck is your point? Start turning on your brain before calling me a Karen.

[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

No, you said you believed going the speed limit was always safer than going with the flow of traffic.

Not only are you a Karen, you're a particularly stupid one.

[–] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

You know, and I know you know, that that's never what is meant by saying it's "safer to travel at the speed of traffic". It's tragic to be sure, but it's not a counter argumement against obeying the law.

[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip -2 points 15 hours ago

It is safer to travel at the speed of traffic. The guy I responded to clearly said that he would rather be a rolling roadblock following speed limits like an idiot, instead of travelling with traffic.