this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2026
36 points (89.1% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14421 readers
344 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] s0ykaf@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

unconditionally good thing

isn't op's point precisely that it's a conditionally good thing?

[–] orlando@hexbear.net 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

no it isn't, in distinguishing the technology from "its employment by capital" it argues from the implicit default of technology being an inherent good.

[–] s0ykaf@hexbear.net 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

he's implying it could be useful (and as such, good) if it weren't for the capitalist motive behind it, or the capitalist system it's set within. those are literally conditions

[–] orlando@hexbear.net 0 points 2 days ago

then marx was wrong i guess. or since "it" could mean anything what you said broadly aligns with what i said.