this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2026
36 points (89.1% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14448 readers
898 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mayakovsky@hexbear.net 23 points 1 month ago (2 children)

downbear: Marx loved literature, he would hate text generator slop

downbear: chat bots are not mechanized looms

downbear: the image and link go to a AI slop website selling edtech which will just be used to undercut schools

Truly a bad post.

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 8 points 1 month ago

downbear: didn't even quote the Maschinenfragment

[–] space_comrade@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Marx loved literature, he would hate text generator slop

You're claiming that based on what exactly? I doubt he'd take a completely luddite stance on it as it's the knee-jerk reaction from a lot of people here.

chat bots are not mechanized looms

Not literally but isn't it the same kind of automation tech that's shaken up whole sections of human labor before? Or at least has the potential to be, I'm not entirely convinced it's here to stay.

[–] Johnny_Arson@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

There is nothing "knee-jerk" about my and many others loathing of llms

[–] space_comrade@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] 389aaa@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago

You can't just deny reality because it doesn't suit your opinions.

There are, in fact, a lot of anti-AI people who are familiar with the technology and have used it and maybe even still use it while absolutely hating it and wanting the technology destroyed.

People do, in fact, have their own opinions. Not everyone worships productivity. Many people acknowledge the usefulness of this technology and still reject it for the cultural, artistic, and cognitive impacts.