this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
98 points (100.0% liked)

memes

23874 readers
249 users here now

dank memes

Rules:

  1. All posts must be memes and follow a general meme setup.

  2. No unedited webcomics.

  3. Someone saying something funny or cringe on twitter/tumblr/reddit/etc. is not a meme. Post that stuff in /c/slop

  4. Va*sh posting is haram and will be removed.

  5. Follow the code of conduct.

  6. Tag OC at the end of your title and we'll probably pin it for a while if we see it.

  7. Recent reposts might be removed.

  8. Tagging OC with the hexbear watermark is praxis.

  9. No anti-natalism memes. See: Eco-fascism Primer

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 42 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I have become convinced that no Westerner knows how to actually fight a war anymore

Just fully replaced the notion of logistics and tactics with cavalry charges and shouting "Wolverines!"

[–] FALGSConaut@hexbear.net 33 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No western military has had to fight a war against anything resembling a peer-to-peer force since Vietnam or Korea, and by now everyone with experience in that sort of fighting is dead or retired. It's all been air strikes and "counter insurgency" for the past 50 years. Walking around Iraq or Afghanistan until you get blown up by an IED doesn't do much to teach you about drone combat or missile interception/avoidance, and leisurely bombing weddings doesn't prepare you to actually avoid being shot down.

And on the contrary, the enemies of imperialism have had near constant experience adapting to American weapons and tactics

[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 24 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Walking around Iraq or Afghanistan until you get blown up by an IED doesn't do much to teach you about drone combat or missile interception/avoidance

The only kid I knew who signed up for the army died this exact way, two weeks after he got deployed to Afghanistan

They wanted us to hold a moment of silence for him, but everyone hated him so it didn't quite work

[–] FALGSConaut@hexbear.net 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 12 points 3 days ago

He sucked and he blew

Up, that is

[–] userse31@hexbear.net 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They wanted us to hold a moment of silence for him, but everyone hated him so it didn't quite work.

Gotta love self solving problems.

[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 13 points 3 days ago

Yeah, he was one of those ROTC (Think Boy Scouts, but for kids who want to go to Army) guys who really wanted to kill brown people

So much so it made everyone in our magnet high school weirded out

After all, we were all supposed to be gifted kids who'd end up in the Ivys

[–] Tabitha@hexbear.net 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

A guy I went to high-school with... I actually like him a little, but barely know him and most of my friends hate him... just joined the military this year.

[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 10 points 3 days ago

My condolences?

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 32 points 4 days ago (1 children)

80% of westerners have their entire education of how conflicts (well, everything, really, lol) work from Hollywood movies where some cracker can just John Wick his way through Fallujah. They think Call of Duty is real

[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 18 points 4 days ago

Thank goodness I read books

[–] FourteenEyes@hexbear.net 31 points 4 days ago (3 children)

There is a significant cohort of Americans convinced that we "won" the Vietnam war because the Vietnamese had more casualties

[–] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 42 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Keep in mind, the U.S. would routinely slaughter entire villages, counting all the old people and children they would kill as 'casualties'. The actual Vietnamese soldier to American soldier casualty ratio was not nearly as lopsided, and quite often entire platoons of soldiers would be sent somewhere, only to be ambushed and killed outside of a few who would escape.

This is one of the reasons many Vietnam vets were so fucked up mentally coming back, was because they knew we were losing the war, that we weren't actually killing that many Vietcong, but they would come back to the U.S. to a media what would claim that they were winning, and that they were taking extremely few casualties.

It was one of the reasons the whole MIA/POW narrative started, was to obscure the number of American casualties coming out of the war.

We decisively lost Vietnam, and the idea that we "pulled our punches" is revisionist horseshit. We killed so many civilians, corraled so many villages, and it didn't make a single bit of difference to us winning the war.

[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 29 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Reminds me of German reports of counter-partisan operations "killed 1000 partisans, captured 10 rifles".

[–] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 32 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's almost, almost as though they were taking military advice from former Nazi commanders... Sorry, I mean, NATO generals.

[–] userse31@hexbear.net 15 points 3 days ago

We killed so many civilians, corraled so many villages, and it didn't make a single bit of difference to us winning the war.

Terror bombing is absolutely fantastic at pissing the enemy off (for pretty self evident reasons), so in a way it did make a different to us winning the war.

As in: It further secured the loss of the US losing.

[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 18 points 4 days ago

These are the same people who are sure Iran is losing while the USA crumbles around them

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 6 points 3 days ago

And an even larger cohort who are convinced that we could have won the Vietnam war if only the anti-war had let amerikkka kill Vietnamese civilians for another five, ten years.

[–] Tabitha@hexbear.net 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Both are required to win a battle. The key to victory is balance.