this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2026
504 points (97.7% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

41178 readers
3058 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yesman@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Patches are not the worst thing in the world. There was a Robocop game, I think for the NES. The developers didn't have time to complete the 5th level, so they put a time limit on the 4th level that was impossible.

Imagine if Cyberpunk or No mans sky were final at launch.

[–] AscendantSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I realize by your last sentence, you mean 'Imagine if Cyberpunk or No mans sky were left unpatched after release.", but it could also read as "Imagine if Cyberpunk or No mans sky weren't released incomplete.", which is way better I think. Just don't release games that aren't finished.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I want to agree, but have to acknowledge that, realistically, they won't even know all the things that need to be addressed before the huge userbase starts poking it.

Back in the day games were limited and the gameplay was generally fairly constrained, making fairly comprehensive QA at least plausible. Now things are so open ended there's no way a company hits all of that.

Though I'm not sure every game needs to be that open ended..

[–] paultimate14@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

The thing is, old incomplete games like that usually sold terribly. They are now either forgotten or worse: remembered for being terrible. Stuff like Superman64.

There used to be more pressure on developers to make good games first. Testing and QA departments have shrunk, or st the very least failed to scale with the increased scope of modern games. They instead rely on consumers to report the bugs.

So at the same time they keep raising prices, they are also pushing more of the work onto the consumers.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Sure, but it will be used for evil more often than good, so I'd rather not have it at all. Never once did I notice my ps2 game needed any sort of patch or update. And guess what, they all still work perfectly. And if the disc goes bad I can covert to SD or Ethernet .

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Imagine if Bethesda couldn't fix all the bugs in their games.

Oh wait, they don't anyway, modders do.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Imagine if Bethesda couldn't fix all the bugs in their games.

Oh wait, they don't anyway, modders do.

Hey, that's a lie!

Not even modders can fix ALL of Bethesda's bugs

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I went to look it up, evidently it was the Commodore 64.

But judging from the context, they wouldn't have even bothered. They knew and made a change to just force an unsatisfying game over. They had ample opportunity to fix it even after release (logistics easier than NES roms), but didn't bother.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

The logistics would have depended on the medium used. C64 also ran cartridges. Though, even if it was a floppy disk release, distributing updates would have been challenging.

For instance, game magazines would distribute sample games as printed basic code that you had to manually type in and save to a blank floppy to use.

[–] DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

That's seems more an argument to not release the game yet than to release and patch later. Patches should be more for fixing bugs than finishing the game after release.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There were 4 versions of smash melee.

Patches existed before, it's not an argument one way or the other.

[–] lastweakness@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How did those patches make it to users?

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

New sales in this case, however other cases saw them included in magazines or mailed out without an extra charge.

[–] lastweakness@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

New sales sound bad. But if they were mailed to the user for free, that sounds great. I'm assuming that was pretty rare though?

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think so, most people didn't take advantage of it even when it was offered.

[–] lastweakness@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago