190
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] zephyreks@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

But these people see no accountability. Wikipedia doesn't have a mechanism of accountability against these anonymous bad actors.

[-] ferristriangle@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

Accountability for what? Failing to delete an article?

Accountability is for people who wield power. The review process denied them the power to delete the article. That seems plenty sufficient to me.

[-] zephyreks@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

The guy has nothing to really tie him to the action so he can just go on the next post and do the same thing. Eventually it'll get through, because Wikipedia isn't staffed by perfect people. That's a bad thing.

[-] ferristriangle@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

Ah, so we're going with "it would be bad if this scenario had a different outcome, so we're just going to pretend this scenario actually represents the bad outcome that didn't happen so I can rationalize being mad about this non-issue."

[-] zephyreks@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

Ah y'know what that's a fair point

this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
190 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13467 readers
771 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS