this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2026
396 points (98.1% liked)

Fuck AI

7597 readers
955 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In March, a girl’s stepfather took his own life after cops discovered that he had used Grok to create 7,000 sexually explicit images using one photo taken when his stepdaughter was 11 years old, the amended complaint alleged.

Grok allowed the man to generate extreme images depicting incest and rape without flagging any harmful behavior, the complaint said. Seemingly, xAI’s child safety system only intervened after the man input a prompt for “gang rape.” That request sent a CyberTip to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), which alerted law enforcement to the AI CSAM.

Yet the harm was not stopped then, either. Despite mandatory reporting requirements to share information like a user’s IP address when CSAM is flagged, xAI repeatedly refused to help cops or NCMEC identify the user, the complaint alleged. For weeks, xAI allegedly “obstructed this investigation at every turn” and made it harder for “law enforcement efforts to locate, identify, and apprehend the perpetrator.”

Eventually, the stepfather was arrested after cops obtained a warrant to seize his devices. That’s when “a forensic review revealed approximately 7,000 AI-generated images and videos” depicting his stepdaughter, which were allegedly produced using Grok. Without Grok providing users with easy access to “undressing” capabilities, his family doubts he ever would have generated the harmful images, which he allegedly trafficked online in trade for “CSAM produced by other child sex predators.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Horrors of this aside… is Grok using a keyword filter for CSAM detection?

I cannot even begin to describe how technically negligent that is.

Image based CSAM detectors have been around for ~2 decades, and any image host with an ounce of self preservation uses them. I’m pretty use some Lemmy instances use them. Twitter must have already been using them, even before Musk bought them.

That they wouldn’t implement a checker in Grok is mind-boggling.

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

What about shareholder value tho?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

is Grok using a keyword filter for CSAM detection?

At some point in the last ten years, everyone apparently forgot why this doesn't work

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Not everyone. Not even AI platforms.

CivitAI is a great example; they have a robust image categorizer that auto tags anything uploaded to the site, or generated on it. They have it divided into a SFW and NSFW sites, and nothing even related to children is allowed on the NSFW side. And by all indications, they have CSAM firmly under control.

It’s why this story is so mind boggling to me. Either Grok’s team is such a mess that they weren’t aware of ancient filtering technology, or they deliberately left it “uncensored” and thought they could get away with it. Either possibility is horrifying.

[–] Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

A pedophile would remove a CSAM checker? Color me shocked.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

He is such a...

A fucking...

LOSER.

This is what capitalism leads to.

Some fucking dweeb with more money than half the world combined.

Capitalism is INCOMPATIBLE with democracy. It's not a system of resource distribution, it is a form of government.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I cannot even begin to describe how technically negligent that is.

Tbh, this is par for the course for most of Elon's businesses

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

But even unintentionally serving CSAM is unique in that it can get you in legal hot water reeeal quick. It’s why web services are so strict about filtering.

I just can’t wrap my head around this. Maybe I’m misreading what Grok did, or maybe the story isn’t quite right, but if it is, the company should be getting raked over hot coals by the feds right about now.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, but remember who's running the FBI right now.

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 4 points 18 hours ago

More likely the Epstein class will be offered given "premium private" accounts.