this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2026
334 points (98.8% liked)

Science Memes

20618 readers
1779 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Let's be fair though. There wasn't a body of data to work from, the science side of it was essentially in its infancy, and you do have to start somewhere.

For all the flaws in his conclusions, he did do a marvelous thing in the awareness of mental health being addressable in a more gentle way

[–] plutopos@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Freud was great, because he was so infuriatingly wrong that the collective drive to disprove him kickstarted psychology /j

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago

I mean, that's at least partly true lol.

[–] Brummbaer@pawb.social 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Freud and anything that came out of it was and is still a talk-therapy for rich people.

If you were working class you had the option of self medication with drugs or being put into an insane asylum, if you broke down.

So yes, Freud is still relevant, if you can afford it basically.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

I don't know that I can agree that the entire field of talk therapy is the sole domain of the rich. I've engaged in one-on-one talk therapy, and that was while entirely jobless and without income of any kind. Got it totally free. It took some jumping through hoops, yeah. And it was as an adjunct to other treatment modalities rather than the primary; but that's actually a good thing, not a bad one since one-on-one is way less effective than other modalities for most people in most situations.

What is absolutely true is that acces without either very high income, or unusually great insurance (here in the US at least) is much harder, and often with long waiting times, as well as being very difficult to schedule. In my area, you can expect to be limited to monthly sessions outside of crisis, and if you have to cancel, it will not be a quick new date. But, again, one-on-one talk therapy isn't a first line of treatment.

There was most definitely a hard class barrier originally, and it's entirely possible it could get that bad again.