this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2026
352 points (95.4% liked)

Science Memes

20656 readers
1891 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Meta Post Tags



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


If you are here asking: "Is this a science meme?"

Probably, yes. We use the Dawkins definition of meme: a replicating idea, not just an image macro with a fact on it. A good post here doesn't need to teach you something. It needs to make you ask something: who, what, where, when, and especially why or how.

Science isn't a filing cabinet of facts, it's a conversation. For example, a photo of an eel or other localized wildlife counts because most people never see one, and wonder is the first step of inquiry. A car meme counts if it makes you curious about what's under the bonnet. If you want to talk about something you noticed in the world, chances are someone else wants to talk about it too.

We moderate for vibe, not category. Pruning is light, especially where a post creates interesting discussion. Experimenting is encouraged.

See the pinned paper on Shitposting as Public Pedagogy if you want the academic case for why this works.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] crazycraw@crazypeople.online 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeahhh, I looked it up and I don't know what OP meant. there are redwood lichen who live symbiotically with the trees but are separate life forms.

Then there's the "redwoods of the sea" huge kelp like algae structures that resemble tree growth patterns but.. like aren't the actual redwood trees.

soooo yeah. I dunno.

[–] crazycraw@crazypeople.online 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

also also pterodactyls aren't and dint evolve from fish. they were flying reptiles that were related to dinosaurs and crocodiles and birds, not fish.

so like facts huh

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Every tetrapod evolved from fish, including humans and pterosaurs.

[–] crazycraw@crazypeople.online -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

ok well yeah I don't disagree all terapods evolved from ancestors we call fish but then.. they and we were also single cell life forms? OP is trying to say they 'are fish' and that's just a random pull from history instead of direct lineage.

sorta like

pTeRodActYLs ArE StaRStUfF

[–] KTJ_microbes@mander.xyz 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I mean, all eukaryotes are Asgardarchaeota ¯\(ツ)

Single-celled is physiological description, though. But I like OPs point. We have a lot of "some group except" categories. Algae (photosynthesizers except land plants), fish (vertebrates except tetrapods), some definitions of protists (eukaryotes except animals, land plants, and fungi). Practically, we use dinosaurs for the long (>65mya) extinct lineages of the clade that also includes birds. But we don't have another name for the clade, so the point is lost.

[–] KTJ_microbes@mander.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

Okay, I don't think people would call purple bacteria algae, it is a bit more complex, algae are basically cyanobacteria and eukaryotes with plastids except land plants.

[–] Entropy_Pyre@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You’re forgetting our first land ancestor, the fish that decided to come up on land. By certain definitions, all land animals that descended from that ancestor are fish.

It’s an obscure biology joke. Doesn’t play into day-to-day conversations. It is the same logic that causes biologists to say that birds are dinosaurs though—because they descended from dinosaurs. But by the same logic, birds also evolved from lizards, and before that amphibians, and from before that fish, etc. This definition is more like putting all of life into nested boxes. Or perhaps it’s more like the saying “all tigers are felines, but not all felines are tigers”.

This definition is helpful for evolutionary biologists to talk about evolution at grand scale and how we might share certain genes with fish. But it’s admittedly not very helpful for day-to-day conversations that say humans are pretty distant from fish and don’t resemble them much at all now. (Though I admittedly love little biology facts like how our middle ear bones evolved from gills.)

Anyway. I get silly excited about this stuff. Random nerdy rant done.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago

Dinosaurs are not lizards.