this post was submitted on 31 May 2026
1480 points (98.9% liked)

Work Reform

16458 readers
1209 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago (7 children)

No work is less valuable than others.

all work is equal

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago

What about ICE?

[–] auzy1@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

I show the same respect to any workers, but, some work is much less specialized.

I wouldn't say a vibe coder is as valuable as a software developer as an example

Also, influencers... Generally not useful at all, and are just trying to score freebies...

Entertainers are valuable and skilled workers. They don't want to have to advertise to make ends meet, that's just how our economy is right now.

[–] kamen@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I consider influencers to be part of the advertisement industry.

[–] black0ut@pawb.social 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well, vibe coding isn't working. That's just letting the machine think for you.

However, even non specialized work is essential. Burger flippers, street cleaners, bus drivers, librarians... They may not have a career as long and specialized as a doctor's, but they're still essential people, and their work should be valued.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Librarian is a job requiring a masters degree. Library clerks don't need formal training however. Bus drivers also require a CDL which I would argue also makes it skilled labor. I wouldn't be surprised if street cleaners also need one.

But yes, many jobs are essential for our society that don't require certifications, education, or formal training. Though I will say that some jobs are more necessary than others. There are both bullshit jobs and jobs where while the labor is real, the benefits of it to society are less than the value produced by it.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

i mean i really believe that in general, but some people really do provide unique services. it's hard to reconcile the two concepts especially because people are allowed their contradictions so whatever

[–] alternategait@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

I think if you decouple capital and earning from skill this "more or less valuable" thing sorts itself out. If I'm hungry, I'd rather have a farmer and a chef around. If I sprain my ankle, I'd rather have a doctor and a PT around. My needs of the moment are not what I always need. My abilities at this moment, are not what my abilities always will be. for example, if I sprain my ankle, I probably can't help the farmer bring in the cattle, but I could help the doctor by setting up the autoclave for surgical tools.

I also feel like if my ability have a home and live in a community and not starve were separated from how my time is spent, I would get to choose both less specialized things and I would probably get to cycle through different things (and prevent burnout). I would adore a schedule that lets me do significant physical labor for 2-4 hours in the morning, child care 2 days a week, geriatric health care 2 days a week, barista another day or two, and creative endeavors the rest of the time. That's not really a job that can or does exist these days and if I tried to cobble it together from part time work, lean staffing would never let it be regular enough to manage all of them without flaking out on someone.

[–] ddplf@szmer.info 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Even Marx knew that's just not true at all. And I'm not even talking about the usual 'garbage collector vs doctor' bullshit.

I'm talking fastfood worker vs cafeteria worker, where one is reheating some chemical wastes to poison people for corporate gains; whereas the other is serving cheap and nutritious food for his local community.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think both of those examples are wild generalizations.

[–] ddplf@szmer.info 0 points 2 days ago

Not as much as the original claim, so I'm fine with that

[–] craftrabbit@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I think work that requires you to study and learn and experience for ages should be paid higher than work you can do without prior experience or know-how.

But you know, reasonably higher. Like 3x at most.

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't care much about pay differences, as long as everybody can afford to live comfortably and nobody can afford to buy politicians.

[–] craftrabbit@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 4 points 2 days ago

This is my stance. If you're working full time you should get a living wage. If you've got more experience or have learned more specialized skills then you should get more on top of that baseline living wage. I think 3x is less than what I would set the cap as but when I say that I'm thinking of people with highly specific technical skills or medical professionals, not CEOs. 3x is a fine cap for them.

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It is. It's TIME.

One hour of your life isn't more precious than one hour of mine.

[–] judgy_jackdaw@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

Person A and person B have to do the same exact task e.g. fix a car or whatever. It takes person A one hour to do the job. Person B is more skilled and experienced, and thus can do the exact same job in 30 minutes. Correct me if I'm wrong, but by your logic I understand that person A should be paid double of what person B is paid, because they gave double of their equally important time. One could argue that since it's the same job being done, they should be paid the same. I would argue person B deserves even more pay for the exact same job that person A did, because they SAVED time. I agree time is valuable, thus doing a job faster is more valuable than doing the exact same job but slower.

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (3 children)

What work isn't equal to others?

[–] spacesatan@lazysoci.al 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sweeping the floor is not equal to doing a heart transplant, stop getting lost in platitudes and get a grip.

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Your ability to completely de-humanize janitorial work says so much about you. Heart transplants cannot happen unless someone sweeps the floor.

Every job is important. Every job matters. Someone working at McDonald's matters to that surgeon who shows up at 2am after a 16 hour day and needs food.

[–] spacesatan@lazysoci.al 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Your ability to completely de-humanize janitorial work says so much about you.

cool strawman bro. Saying sweeping up dust is less important than saving a life is not saying "and you're a worm if you ever sweep a floor". I've had to sweep the floor at almost every job I've had, it was never as important as someone's life.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I love how people tell on themselves by projecting their own prejudices and then get mad at the person they did it at, as though they had anything to do with the process

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago

I have a prejudice that I believe every job is important and every job is worth doing? And every job is required for other jobs to succeed?

When the fuck did I find myself back on reddit?

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

it was never as important as someone's life.

It could never have happened without someone cleaning the operating room.

Serious question. Are you intentionally being dense? Or just come by it accindently?

[–] spacesatan@lazysoci.al 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

"ah but what if I change the example you used to a different example"

ok man have fun playing with your strawmen. Sweeping the floor of a warehouse is still not equally as important as life saving medical work.

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

There's no straw man, but. I'm not inventing a narrative. Every job is important.

Just because you don't think people who sweep floors matters to society doesn't change my opinion.

Sweeping the floor of a warehouse is still not equally as important as life saving medical work

That warehouse could contain medical supplies. They could contain parts to build trucks that will transport medical supplies. That warehouse could contain equipment to build the medical devices that the surgeon could use.

You're just someone who deems worth based on what they do in completion, not that work and society all works together as a giant organism. And to look down at anyone who does manual labour as less than someone who saves lives is extremely sad. You should be ashamed.

[–] spacesatan@lazysoci.al 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

That is not what I said. That is another strawman.

You said EQUALLY important. I gave you examples of jobs that are not EQUALLY important.

That warehouse could contain medical supplies. They could contain parts to build trucks that will transport medical supplies. That warehouse could contain equipment to build the medical devices that the surgeon could use.

It didn't it was mostly garbage fast fashion $5 shirts made to be worn once and thrown out.

. And to look down at anyone who does manual labour as less than someone who saves lives is extremely sad. You should be ashamed.

Fuck you quit projecting. I was using my own work as an example kiss my ass. YOU are the only one conflating the value of someone's labor with their value as a human.

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Yeah no. I refuse to be someone who thinks someone's worth is worthless because of the labour they do. Every job is important. Every job is necessary. I've never said wages or other such things should be equal but every man's labour should be considered equal. Everyone does a job for a reason and every job is required for other jobs to function.

Just because you think a janitor's job doesn't matter in society as much as a heart surgeon still doesn't change my opinion.

And you might want to look up what a strawman argument is, because I don't think you understand the definition correctly. You're the one who brought up janitor vs heart surgeon, not me. Last I checked, BOTH JOBS ARE NECESSARY JOBS AND BOTH ARE EQUAL IN THEIR WORTH.

[–] spacesatan@lazysoci.al 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

ok. maybe this will help.

Lets say there is a shortage of trauma surgeons and a shortage of theme park ~~groundskeepers~~ ride engineers. Is fixing one of these shortages more important?

Does that imply anything about the relative value of the labor being performed?

[–] ddplf@szmer.info 2 points 2 days ago

How much you wanna bet the guy is just gonna ignore your comment or claim that you hate theme park staff?

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

worthless because of the labour they do

That is not what the other person is saying. Stop being dumb.

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I love the fact we're in a work reform instance and people are falling over backwards to dehumanize labour.

It's remarkable. They literally said someone who sweeps the floors is worth less than someone giving a heart transplant, but the person sweeping the floors is integral to that surgeon performing the heart transplant.

And so many people here want to completely say the work by the janitor which is essential to the work of the surgeon should be worth less.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I hope you maintain that position when you go in for lifesaving surgery and it's just some dude with a broom.

[–] ddplf@szmer.info 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Noone's gonna fucking die if you miss a spot when sweeping, you gully

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

In a hospital surgical room? Yeah they can.

[–] ddplf@szmer.info 0 points 1 day ago

Here's hoping you're just trolling, because I wouldn't want to insult a lobotomite

[–] spacesatan@lazysoci.al 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You wouldn't sweep an OR you would mop or squeegee. Kinda like the example I used was 'sweeping a floor' and not your straw example of 'sanitizing a surgical theater.'

[–] hardcoreufo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

C suite work for example is completely useless.

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

The unnecessary one.

[–] poopsmith@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You are not required to judge the value of work based on its output. While some types of work may produce output that is relatively more beneficial to society than is other work, a society can choose to believe that the value of the work lies in the effort rather than the output. From each according to their ability, to each according to their need. This is the core tenet of Marxism. It's entirely a matter of which paradigm you choose to accept. There is no right answer to this question, only reflections of what you value.

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

society can choose to believe that the value of the work lies in the effort rather than the output

Beliefs won't feed you. Raw output won't feed you either. What feeds you is an output of things society actually needs. There's no reasonable way of gathering information of what every single member of society needs, worse some members will lie to get more resources than they should. That approach has fundamentally unsolvable problems

[–] poopsmith@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The problems you list are solvable, but you have apparently lacked the intellectual curiosity to investigate how they can be solved. I won’t debate the basic tenets of Marxism with you because it will take too much time and effort, and I have no way to know if you’re genuinely interested or just another troll. But you can find numerous reading lists here if you want to understand.

[–] judgy_jackdaw@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

The problems they listed are unsolvable, but you have apparently lacked the intellectual curiosity to investigate why the supposed solutions would not actually work. I won’t debate the basics of the impracticability of Marxism in large and interconnected societies with you because it will take too much time and effort, and I have no way to know if you’re genuinely interested or just another troll.

See, others can do it too ;)

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

The problems you list are solvable

They aren't. Every solution proposed by Marxists is fatally flawed.

[–] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 days ago

Hell yeah! Guard labor is real labor! FOP unions are real unions! Solidarity with the guys who tear gas you!