this post was submitted on 31 May 2026
1481 points (98.9% liked)

Work Reform

16466 readers
158 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It is. It's TIME.

One hour of your life isn't more precious than one hour of mine.

[–] judgy_jackdaw@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

Person A and person B have to do the same exact task e.g. fix a car or whatever. It takes person A one hour to do the job. Person B is more skilled and experienced, and thus can do the exact same job in 30 minutes. Correct me if I'm wrong, but by your logic I understand that person A should be paid double of what person B is paid, because they gave double of their equally important time. One could argue that since it's the same job being done, they should be paid the same. I would argue person B deserves even more pay for the exact same job that person A did, because they SAVED time. I agree time is valuable, thus doing a job faster is more valuable than doing the exact same job but slower.

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (3 children)

What work isn't equal to others?

[–] spacesatan@lazysoci.al 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sweeping the floor is not equal to doing a heart transplant, stop getting lost in platitudes and get a grip.

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Your ability to completely de-humanize janitorial work says so much about you. Heart transplants cannot happen unless someone sweeps the floor.

Every job is important. Every job matters. Someone working at McDonald's matters to that surgeon who shows up at 2am after a 16 hour day and needs food.

[–] spacesatan@lazysoci.al 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Your ability to completely de-humanize janitorial work says so much about you.

cool strawman bro. Saying sweeping up dust is less important than saving a life is not saying "and you're a worm if you ever sweep a floor". I've had to sweep the floor at almost every job I've had, it was never as important as someone's life.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I love how people tell on themselves by projecting their own prejudices and then get mad at the person they did it at, as though they had anything to do with the process

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago

I have a prejudice that I believe every job is important and every job is worth doing? And every job is required for other jobs to succeed?

When the fuck did I find myself back on reddit?

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

it was never as important as someone's life.

It could never have happened without someone cleaning the operating room.

Serious question. Are you intentionally being dense? Or just come by it accindently?

[–] spacesatan@lazysoci.al 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

"ah but what if I change the example you used to a different example"

ok man have fun playing with your strawmen. Sweeping the floor of a warehouse is still not equally as important as life saving medical work.

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

There's no straw man, but. I'm not inventing a narrative. Every job is important.

Just because you don't think people who sweep floors matters to society doesn't change my opinion.

Sweeping the floor of a warehouse is still not equally as important as life saving medical work

That warehouse could contain medical supplies. They could contain parts to build trucks that will transport medical supplies. That warehouse could contain equipment to build the medical devices that the surgeon could use.

You're just someone who deems worth based on what they do in completion, not that work and society all works together as a giant organism. And to look down at anyone who does manual labour as less than someone who saves lives is extremely sad. You should be ashamed.

[–] spacesatan@lazysoci.al 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

That is not what I said. That is another strawman.

You said EQUALLY important. I gave you examples of jobs that are not EQUALLY important.

That warehouse could contain medical supplies. They could contain parts to build trucks that will transport medical supplies. That warehouse could contain equipment to build the medical devices that the surgeon could use.

It didn't it was mostly garbage fast fashion $5 shirts made to be worn once and thrown out.

. And to look down at anyone who does manual labour as less than someone who saves lives is extremely sad. You should be ashamed.

Fuck you quit projecting. I was using my own work as an example kiss my ass. YOU are the only one conflating the value of someone's labor with their value as a human.

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Yeah no. I refuse to be someone who thinks someone's worth is worthless because of the labour they do. Every job is important. Every job is necessary. I've never said wages or other such things should be equal but every man's labour should be considered equal. Everyone does a job for a reason and every job is required for other jobs to function.

Just because you think a janitor's job doesn't matter in society as much as a heart surgeon still doesn't change my opinion.

And you might want to look up what a strawman argument is, because I don't think you understand the definition correctly. You're the one who brought up janitor vs heart surgeon, not me. Last I checked, BOTH JOBS ARE NECESSARY JOBS AND BOTH ARE EQUAL IN THEIR WORTH.

[–] spacesatan@lazysoci.al 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

ok. maybe this will help.

Lets say there is a shortage of trauma surgeons and a shortage of theme park ~~groundskeepers~~ ride engineers. Is fixing one of these shortages more important?

Does that imply anything about the relative value of the labor being performed?

[–] ddplf@szmer.info 2 points 2 days ago

How much you wanna bet the guy is just gonna ignore your comment or claim that you hate theme park staff?

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

worthless because of the labour they do

That is not what the other person is saying. Stop being dumb.

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I love the fact we're in a work reform instance and people are falling over backwards to dehumanize labour.

It's remarkable. They literally said someone who sweeps the floors is worth less than someone giving a heart transplant, but the person sweeping the floors is integral to that surgeon performing the heart transplant.

And so many people here want to completely say the work by the janitor which is essential to the work of the surgeon should be worth less.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I hope you maintain that position when you go in for lifesaving surgery and it's just some dude with a broom.

[–] ddplf@szmer.info 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Noone's gonna fucking die if you miss a spot when sweeping, you gully

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

In a hospital surgical room? Yeah they can.

[–] ddplf@szmer.info 0 points 1 day ago

Here's hoping you're just trolling, because I wouldn't want to insult a lobotomite

[–] spacesatan@lazysoci.al 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

You wouldn't sweep an OR you would mop or squeegee. Kinda like the example I used was 'sweeping a floor' and not your straw example of 'sanitizing a surgical theater.'

[–] hardcoreufo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

C suite work for example is completely useless.

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

The unnecessary one.

[–] poopsmith@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You are not required to judge the value of work based on its output. While some types of work may produce output that is relatively more beneficial to society than is other work, a society can choose to believe that the value of the work lies in the effort rather than the output. From each according to their ability, to each according to their need. This is the core tenet of Marxism. It's entirely a matter of which paradigm you choose to accept. There is no right answer to this question, only reflections of what you value.

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

society can choose to believe that the value of the work lies in the effort rather than the output

Beliefs won't feed you. Raw output won't feed you either. What feeds you is an output of things society actually needs. There's no reasonable way of gathering information of what every single member of society needs, worse some members will lie to get more resources than they should. That approach has fundamentally unsolvable problems

[–] poopsmith@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The problems you list are solvable, but you have apparently lacked the intellectual curiosity to investigate how they can be solved. I won’t debate the basic tenets of Marxism with you because it will take too much time and effort, and I have no way to know if you’re genuinely interested or just another troll. But you can find numerous reading lists here if you want to understand.

[–] judgy_jackdaw@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

The problems they listed are unsolvable, but you have apparently lacked the intellectual curiosity to investigate why the supposed solutions would not actually work. I won’t debate the basics of the impracticability of Marxism in large and interconnected societies with you because it will take too much time and effort, and I have no way to know if you’re genuinely interested or just another troll.

See, others can do it too ;)

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

The problems you list are solvable

They aren't. Every solution proposed by Marxists is fatally flawed.