this post was submitted on 27 May 2026
191 points (98.5% liked)
Television
2449 readers
59 users here now
Welcome to Television
This community is for discussion of anything related to television or streaming.
Other Communities
- !casualconversation@piefed.social
- !movies@piefed.social
- !animation@piefed.social
- !trailers@lemmy.blahaj.zone
Television Communities
A community for discussion of anything related to Television via broadcast or streaming.
Rules:
- Be respectful and courteous to all members.
- Avoid offensive or discriminatory remarks.
- Avoid spamming or promoting unrelated products/services.
- Avoid personal attacks or engaging in heated arguments.
- Do not engage in any form of illegal activity or promote illegal content.
- Please mask any and all spoilers with spoiler tags.
List of Best Rated TV Series as voted by the Fediverse
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
False copyright notices should be instant major fucking fines all the way up to complete dissolution of the compay.
We are going on thirty years of this DMCA shit and all it's ever been used for is a back door for corporations to silence critics.
That’s not true, corporations have also used it to steal from legitimate rightsholders
Had me in the first half.
Judges should be required to neuter the prosecution when they are clearly using the expense of the legal system to strongarm someone.
Not...like...literally neuter. I mean if the defense is financially limited and could only afford a single lawyer and a couple paralegals, then the prosecution should be limited to the same resources. Maybe by reviewing billed hours or something. Idk.
Otherwise the prosecution is just a big bully.
I'd be OK with literal neutering in this case.
i vote for literal and metaphorical neutering
In these cases it’d probably have to be the defense that’s neutered. Usually the way it works is a corporation uses something they may or may not have the rights to use in a video they post to youtube or similar, then the original gets copyright striked because the content id recognizes it from the corporate media it’s there to protect. The original rightsholder can try to contact support (if there even is any) but they usually will just say get fucked. At that point you’d have to sue google/the infringing corpo which would probably cost more than they’d make anyways
How do you shold a right?
Carefully, with a firm and steady grip
Gently then vigorously
Same as a colds houlder
Oxymoron. There is no such thing.
Agreeing with you would mean not believing that AI is stealing from artists. Just saying.
(I think a lot is wrong with copyrights and especially patents, and am all for breaking them in some circumstances, but not totally abolishing them.)
Right. How could it be when no theft has occurred?
It isn't stealing anything from anyone and artists have been making art long before the concept of property was even invented.
If you need a reason to justify the trendy "AI bad" narrative, there are plenty of others to choose from that aren't total bullshit.
Whilst capitalism exists, there is
Key word: legitimate
At minimum, you should lose the right to make a claim again for a fixed period of time, which increases exponentially for each additional false claim.
Surelly if you're knowingly sending a false copyright notice that's the Crime of Fraud and thus the actual people doing it and those ordering are Criminally Responsible for those action?!